» Articles » PMID: 24673257

Molecular Imaging of Tumor Hypoxia with Positron Emission Tomography

Overview
Journal Radiat Res
Specialties Genetics
Radiology
Date 2014 Mar 29
PMID 24673257
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The problem of tumor hypoxia has been recognized and studied by the oncology community for over 60 years. From radiation and chemotherapy resistance to the increased risk of metastasis, low oxygen concentrations in tumors have caused patients with many types of tumors to respond poorly to conventional cancer therapies. It is clear that patients with high levels of tumor hypoxia have a poorer overall treatment response and that the magnitude of hypoxia is an important prognostic factor. As a result, the development of methods to measure tumor hypoxia using invasive and noninvasive techniques has become desirable to the clinical oncology community. A variety of imaging modalities have been established to visualize hypoxia in vivo. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, in particular, has played a key role for imaging tumor hypoxia because of the development of hypoxia-specific radiolabelled agents. Consequently, this technique is increasingly used in the clinic for a wide variety of cancer types. Following a broad overview of the complexity of tumor hypoxia and measurement techniques to date, this article will focus specifically on the accuracy and reproducibility of PET imaging to quantify tumor hypoxia. Despite numerous advances in the field of PET imaging for hypoxia, we continue to search for the ideal hypoxia tracer to both qualitatively and quantitatively define the tumor hypoxic volume in a clinical setting to optimize treatments and predict response in cancer patients.

Citing Articles

Kinetic Evaluation of the Hypoxia Radiotracers [F]FMISO and [F]FAZA in Dogs with Spontaneous Tumors Using Dynamic PET/CT Imaging.

Choen S, Kent M, Chaudhari A, Cherry S, Krtolica A, Zwingenberger A Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023; 57(1):16-25.

PMID: 36643946 PMC: 9832187. DOI: 10.1007/s13139-022-00780-4.


The Role of Imaging Biomarkers to Guide Pharmacological Interventions Targeting Tumor Hypoxia.

Gallez B Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:853568.

PMID: 35910347 PMC: 9335493. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.853568.


Hypoxia in relationship to tumor volume using hypoxia PET-imaging in head & neck cancer - A scoping review.

Hildingsson S, Gebre-Medhin M, Zschaeck S, Adrian G Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2022; 36:40-46.

PMID: 35769424 PMC: 9234341. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.06.004.


Imaging methods to evaluate tumor microenvironment factors affecting nanoparticle drug delivery and antitumor response.

Moody A, Dayton P, Zamboni W Cancer Drug Resist. 2021; 4:382-413.

PMID: 34796317 PMC: 8597952. DOI: 10.20517/cdr.2020.94.


Overall Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and SUV of Nodal Metastases Predict Outcome in Head and Neck Cancer Before Chemoradiation.

Werner J, Strobel K, Lehnick D, Rajan G Front Oncol. 2021; 11:679287.

PMID: 34692472 PMC: 8534919. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.679287.


References
1.
Geets X, Gregoire V, Lee J . Implementation of hypoxia PET imaging in radiation therapy planning. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013; 57(3):271-82. View

2.
Semenza G . Targeting HIF-1 for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003; 3(10):721-32. DOI: 10.1038/nrc1187. View

3.
Eschmann S, Paulsen F, Reimold M, Dittmann H, Welz S, Reischl G . Prognostic impact of hypoxia imaging with 18F-misonidazole PET in non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer before radiotherapy. J Nucl Med. 2005; 46(2):253-60. View

4.
Vaupel P, Mayer A . Hypoxia in cancer: significance and impact on clinical outcome. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007; 26(2):225-39. DOI: 10.1007/s10555-007-9055-1. View

5.
Monnich D, Troost E, Kaanders J, Oyen W, Alber M, Thorwarth D . Modelling and simulation of [18F]fluoromisonidazole dynamics based on histology-derived microvessel maps. Phys Med Biol. 2011; 56(7):2045-57. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/7/009. View