» Articles » PMID: 24671745

Obligate Insect Endosymbionts Exhibit Increased Ortholog Length Variation and Loss of Large Accessory Proteins Concurrent with Genome Shrinkage

Overview
Date 2014 Mar 28
PMID 24671745
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Extreme genome reduction has been observed in obligate intracellular insect mutualists and is an assumed consequence of fixed, long-term host isolation. Rapid accumulation of mutations and pseudogenization of genes no longer vital for an intracellular lifestyle, followed by deletion of many genes, are factors that lead to genome reduction. Size reductions in individual genes due to small-scale deletions have also been implicated in contributing to overall genome shrinkage. Conserved protein functional domains are expected to exhibit low tolerance for mutations and therefore remain relatively unchanged throughout protein length reduction while nondomain regions, presumably under less selective pressures, would shorten. This hypothesis was tested using orthologous protein sets from the Flavobacteriaceae (phylum: Bacteroidetes) and Enterobacteriaceae (subphylum: Gammaproteobacteria) families, each of which includes some of the smallest known genomes. Upon examination of protein, functional domain, and nondomain region lengths, we found that proteins were not uniformly shrinking with genome reduction, but instead increased length variability and variability was observed in both the functional domain and nondomain regions. Additionally, as complete gene loss also contributes to overall genome shrinkage, we found that the largest proteins in the proteomes of nonhost-restricted bacteroidetial and gammaproteobacterial species often were inferred to be involved in secondary metabolic processes, extracellular sensing, or of unknown function. These proteins were absent in the proteomes of obligate insect endosymbionts. Therefore, loss of genes encoding large proteins not required for host-restricted lifestyles in obligate endosymbiont proteomes likely contributes to extreme genome reduction to a greater degree than gene shrinkage.

Citing Articles

Comparative genomics of Mollicutes-related endobacteria supports a late invasion into Mucoromycota fungi.

Longley R, Robinson A, Liber J, Bryson A, Morales D, Labutti K Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):948.

PMID: 37723238 PMC: 10507103. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05299-8.


Reduced Genome of the Gut Symbiotic Bacterium " Benitsuchiphilus tojoi" Provides Insight Into Its Possible Roles in Ecology and Adaptation of the Host Insect.

Mondal S, Akter A, Koga R, Hosokawa T, Dayi M, Murase K Front Microbiol. 2020; 11:840.

PMID: 32435239 PMC: 7218078. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00840.


Diverse deep-sea anglerfishes share a genetically reduced luminous symbiont that is acquired from the environment.

Baker L, Freed L, Easson C, Lopez J, Fenolio D, Sutton T Elife. 2019; 8.

PMID: 31571583 PMC: 6773444. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.47606.


Cladogenesis and Genomic Streamlining in Extracellular Endosymbionts of Tropical Stink Bugs.

Otero-Bravo A, Goffredi S, Sabree Z Genome Biol Evol. 2018; 10(2):680-693.

PMID: 29420776 PMC: 5822708. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evy033.


Habitat visualization and genomic analysis of "Candidatus Pantoea carbekii," the primary symbiont of the brown marmorated stink bug.

Kenyon L, Meulia T, Sabree Z Genome Biol Evol. 2015; 7(2):620-35.

PMID: 25587021 PMC: 4350177. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evv006.

References
1.
Moran N . Accelerated evolution and Muller's rachet in endosymbiotic bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93(7):2873-8. PMC: 39726. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.7.2873. View

2.
Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J . A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst Biol. 2008; 57(5):758-71. DOI: 10.1080/10635150802429642. View

3.
HILL C, Sandt C, Vlazny D . Rhs elements of Escherichia coli: a family of genetic composites each encoding a large mosaic protein. Mol Microbiol. 1994; 12(6):865-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb01074.x. View

4.
Chothia C, Gough J . Genomic and structural aspects of protein evolution. Biochem J. 2009; 419(1):15-28. DOI: 10.1042/BJ20090122. View

5.
Kurland C, Canback B, Berg O . The origins of modern proteomes. Biochimie. 2007; 89(12):1454-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2007.09.004. View