» Articles » PMID: 24670828

The "DEBELLUM"--lower Limb Multilevel Treatment with Drug Eluting Balloon--randomized Trial: 1-year Results

Overview
Date 2014 Mar 28
PMID 24670828
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: The aim of the present paper was to make a report of the 12-month clinical outcomes of the DEBELLUM (Drug-Eluting-Balloon-Evaluation-for-Lower-Limb- mUltilevel-treatMent) randomized trial.

Methods: From September 2010 to March 2011, 50 patients were randomized between drug eluting balloon (DEB, N.=25) and conventional angioplasty balloon (PTA, N.=25). Patients were symptomatic for claudication and critical limb ischemia, with de novo stenosis or occlusion in the femoropopliteal (SFA) and infrapopliteal (BTK) region. Only in the SFA primary stenting was allowed and postdilatation performed with DEB or PTA depending on the assigned group.

Results: One hundred and twenty-two lesions were treated: 92 (75.4%) SFA, 30 (24.6%) BTK. Twenty (40%) patients presented multilevel concomitant femoropopliteal and infra-popliteal lesions. Late lumen loss (LLL) was 0.64±0.9 mm in DEB group vs. 1.81±0.1 mm in the control group (P=0.01). In non-stented segment LLL was 0.63±0.9 mm (DEB) vs. 1.70±0.6 mm (PTA), P<0.01. In the stent subgroup was LLL 0.65±0.2 mm (DEB) vs. 1.91±0.3 mm (PTA), P<0.01. In the femoropopliteal region the overall LLL was 0.61±0.8 mm for DEB vs. 1.84±0.3 mm for PTA (P=0.02). BTK the overall LLL was 0.66±0.9 mm (DEB) vs. 1.69±0.5 mm (PTA) (P=0.03). The overall TLR was 12.2% for DEB and 35.3% for PTA (P<0.05). Amputation rate was 4% (DEB) vs. 12% (PTA), P=0.36. Thrombosis was 4% (DEB) vs. 8% (PTA), P≥0.05. Major adverse events 24% (DEB) vs. 60% (PTA), P<0.05. ABI improved more in the DEB group: 0.81±0.3 vs. 0.68±0.13 (P=0.02). Fontaine stage increased (from II b to I) 80% DEB vs. 56% PTA (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Results confirm and reinforce initial 6-month outcomes. In.Pact DEB balloons can be considered efficient to reduce restenosis rate.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Endovascular Interventions for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Artery Disease: A Network Meta-analysis.

Schwartz A, Shah Y, Huang H, Nathan A, Fanaroff A, Giri J J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025; 4(1):102432.

PMID: 40061407 PMC: 11887560. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102432.


Primary results of the SAVAL randomized trial of a paclitaxel-eluting nitinol stent versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in infrapopliteal arteries.

van Overhagen H, Nakamura M, Geraghty P, Rao S, Arroyo M, Soga Y Vasc Med. 2023; 28(6):571-580.

PMID: 37844137 PMC: 10693734. DOI: 10.1177/1358863X231199489.


How I do it: optimizing angioplasty using the Tack endovascular system in the management of chronic limb threatening ischemia.

Siah M, Babb J, Schneider P J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023; 9(4):101206.

PMID: 37818168 PMC: 10560835. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101206.


Atherosclerotic plaque composition and specific endovascular considerations in the end stage renal disease patients: a narrative review.

Ruff C, Artzner C, Nikoalou K, Grozinger G Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2023; 13(1):133-146.

PMID: 36864951 PMC: 9971292. DOI: 10.21037/cdt-22-53.


Safety of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhang C, Yin G PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0275888.

PMID: 36227807 PMC: 9560511. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275888.