» Articles » PMID: 2466850

The Hyaluronate Receptor is Preferentially Expressed on Proliferating Epithelial Cells

Overview
Journal J Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 1989 Apr 1
PMID 2466850
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the present study, we have examined the distribution of the hyaluronate receptor as well as hyaluronate itself in a variety of adult tissues. The hyaluronate receptor was localized with a monoclonal antibody, termed K-3, while hyaluronate was localized using proteolytic fragments of cartilage proteoglycan. Staining with the K-3 monoclonal antibody revealed that the hyaluronate receptor was present in a variety of epithelia including the skin, cheek, tongue, esophagus, vagina, intestines, oviduct, and bladder. However, it was notably absent from epithelial cells of the cornea and stomach as well as from endothelial cells of blood vessels. When present, the hyaluronate receptor was preferentially located in regions of active cell growth, such as in the basal layers of stratified epithelium and at the base of the crypts of Lieberkuhn in intestinal epithelium. A similar phenomenon was observed in cultured 3T3 cells. Cultures of 3T3 cells that were actively proliferating were found to have greater amounts of the receptor than their nonproliferating counterparts. When the various tissues were examined for hyaluronate, it was found to have a widespread distribution, being present in most of the basement membranes and between the cells in stratified epithelium. Indeed, in many cases, the distribution of hyaluronate closely paralleled that of the hyaluronate receptor. These results suggest that the interaction between hyaluronate and its receptor is involved in cell-to-substratum adhesion.

Citing Articles

Hyaluronan-Conjugated Carbon Quantum Dots for Bioimaging Use.

Karakocak B, Laradji A, Primeau T, Berezin M, Li S, Ravi N ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020; 13(1):277-286.

PMID: 33355448 PMC: 8243741. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c20088.


Structure, function and role of CD44 in neoplasia.

Mishra M, Chandavarkar V, Sharma R, Bhargava D J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2019; 23(2):267-272.

PMID: 31516234 PMC: 6714250. DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_246_18.


Hyaluronan-Based Grafting Strategies for Liver Stem Cell Therapy and Tracking Methods.

Nevi L, Safarikia S, Di Matteo S, Biancaniello F, Chiappetta M, Cardinale V Stem Cells Int. 2019; 2019:3620546.

PMID: 31354838 PMC: 6636496. DOI: 10.1155/2019/3620546.


Morphogenesis and Compartmentalization of the Intestinal Crypt.

Sumigray K, Terwilliger M, Lechler T Dev Cell. 2018; 45(2):183-197.e5.

PMID: 29689194 PMC: 5987226. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.03.024.


TGF-β reduces DNA ds-break repair mechanisms to heighten genetic diversity and adaptability of CD44+/CD24- cancer cells.

Pal D, Pertot A, Shirole N, Yao Z, Anaparthy N, Garvin T Elife. 2017; 6.

PMID: 28092266 PMC: 5345931. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.21615.


References
1.
Chang W, Leblond C . Renewal of the epithelium in the descending colon of the mouse. II. Renewal of argentaffin cells. Am J Anat. 1971; 131(1):101-9. DOI: 10.1002/aja.1001310106. View

2.
GRAHAM Jr R, LUNDHOLM U, Karnovsky M . CYTOCHEMICAL DEMONSTRATION OF PEROXIDASE ACTIVITY WITH 3-AMINO-9-ETHYLCARBAZOLE. J Histochem Cytochem. 1965; 13:150-2. DOI: 10.1177/13.2.150. View

3.
Nakane P . Localization of hormones with the peroxidase-labeled antibody method. Methods Enzymol. 1975; 37:133-44. DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(75)37011-0. View

4.
Cohn R, Cassiman J, BERNFIELD M . Relationship of transformation, cell density, and growth control to the cellular distribution of newly synthesized glycosaminoglycan. J Cell Biol. 1976; 71(1):280-94. PMC: 2109728. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.71.1.280. View

5.
Underhill C, DORFMAN A . The role of hyaluronic acid in intercellular adhesion of cultured mouse cells. Exp Cell Res. 1978; 117(1):155-64. DOI: 10.1016/0014-4827(78)90438-x. View