» Articles » PMID: 24668162

Determination of the Longest Intrapatient Left Ventricular Electrical Delay May Predict Acute Hemodynamic Improvement in Patients After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Overview
Date 2014 Mar 27
PMID 24668162
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: One of the reasons for patient nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy is a suboptimal left ventricular (LV) pacing site. LV electric delay (Q-LV interval) has been indicated as a prognostic parameter of cardiac resynchronization therapy response. This study evaluates the LV delay for the optimization of the LV pacing site.

Methods And Results: Thirty-two consecutive patients (23 men; mean age, 71±11 years; LV ejection fraction, 30±6%; 18 with ischemic cardiomyopathy; QRS, 181±25 ms; all mean±SD) underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation. All available tributary veins of the coronary sinus were tested, and the Q-LV interval was measured at each pacing site. The hemodynamic effects of pacing at different sites were evaluated by invasive measurement of LV dP/dtmax at baseline and during pacing. Overall, 2.9±0.8 different veins and 6.4±2.3 pacing sites were tested. In 31 of 32 (96.8%) patients, the highest LV dP/dtmax coincided with the maximum Q-LV interval. Q-LV interval correlated with the increase in LV dP/dtmax in all patients at each site (AR1 ρ=0.98; P<0.001). A Q-LV value >95 ms corresponded to a >10% in LV dP/dtmax. An inverse correlation between paced QRS duration and improvement in LV dP/dtmax was seen in 24 patients (75%).

Conclusions: Pacing the LV at the latest activated site is highly predictive of the maximum increase in contractility, expressed as LV dP/dtmax. A positive correlation between Q-LV interval and hemodynamic improvement was found in all patients at every pacing site, a value of 95 ms corresponding to an increase in LV dP/dtmax of ≥10%.

Citing Articles

2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure.

Chung M, Patton K, Lau C, Dal Forno A, Al-Khatib S, Arora V J Arrhythm. 2023; 39(5):681-756.

PMID: 37799799 PMC: 10549836. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12872.


2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure.

Chung M, Patton K, Lau C, Dal Forno A, Al-Khatib S, Arora V Heart Rhythm. 2023; 20(9):e17-e91.

PMID: 37283271 PMC: 11062890. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.03.1538.


Time-related factors predicting a positive response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with heart failure.

Wilczek J, Jadczyk T, Wojakowski W, Golba K Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):8524.

PMID: 37237039 PMC: 10219980. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35174-9.


Computational electrophysiology of the coronary sinus branches based on electro-anatomical mapping for the prediction of the latest activated region.

Vergara C, Stella S, Maines M, Africa P, Catanzariti D, Dematte C Med Biol Eng Comput. 2022; 60(8):2307-2319.

PMID: 35729476 PMC: 9293833. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-022-02610-3.


Novel active fixation lead guided by electrical delay can improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure.

Casale M, Mezzetti M, De Fazio M, Caccamo L, Busacca P, Dattilo G ESC Heart Fail. 2021; 9(1):146-154.

PMID: 34953050 PMC: 8788056. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13727.