» Articles » PMID: 24667839

Validation of the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Mar 27
PMID 24667839
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Organizational culture is a commonly studied area in industrial/organizational psychology due to its important role in workplace behaviour, cognitions, and outcomes. Jung et al.'s [1] review of the psychometric properties of organizational culture measurement instruments noted many instruments have limited validation data despite frequent use in both theoretical and applied situations. The Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) has had conflicting data regarding its psychometric properties, particularly regarding its factor structure. Our study examined the factor structure and criterion validity of the OCAI using robust analysis methods on data gathered from 328 (females = 226, males = 102) Australian employees. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a four factor structure of the OCAI for both ideal and current organizational culture perspectives. Current organizational culture data demonstrated expected reciprocally-opposed relationships between three of the four OCAI factors and the outcome variable of job satisfaction but ideal culture data did not, thus indicating possible weak criterion validity when the OCAI is used to assess ideal culture. Based on the mixed evidence regarding the measure's properties, further examination of the factor structure and broad validity of the measure is encouraged.

Citing Articles

Unveiling the Heartbeat of Healing: Exploring Organizational Culture in a Tertiary Hospital's Emergency Medicine Department and Its Influence on Employee Behavior and Well-Being.

DSilva R, Balakrishnan J, Bari T, Verma R, Kamath R Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(7).

PMID: 39063488 PMC: 11277175. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21070912.


Evaluation of organizational culture in enterprises in the Czech Republic using OCAI.

Balkova M, Jambal T Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1297041.

PMID: 38146398 PMC: 10749531. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1297041.


Protocol for WeExPAnd: a prospective, mixed-methods pilot demonstration study to increase access to pre-exposure prophylaxis among women vulnerable to HIV infection in the Southern USA.

Psaros C, Goodman G, McDonald V, Ott C, Blyler A, Rivas A BMJ Open. 2023; 13(6):e075250.

PMID: 37286316 PMC: 10255226. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075250.


Spanish Adaptation of the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument: Reflection on the Difficulty in Transferring the Factor.

Assens-Serra J, Boada-Cuerva M, Serrano-Fernandez M, Villajos E, Boada-Grau J Front Psychol. 2022; 12:817232.

PMID: 35002905 PMC: 8740165. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.817232.


The impact of implementing a person-centred pain management intervention on resistance to change and organizational culture.

Angelini E, Wolf A, Wijk H, Brisby H, Baranto A BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21(1):1323.

PMID: 34895215 PMC: 8665601. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06819-0.


References
1.
Tzeng H, Ketefian S, Redman R . Relationship of nurses' assessment of organizational culture, job satisfaction, and patient satisfaction with nursing care. Int J Nurs Stud. 2001; 39(1):79-84. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7489(00)00121-8. View

2.
Helfrich C, Li Y, Mohr D, Meterko M, Sales A . Assessing an organizational culture instrument based on the Competing Values Framework: exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Implement Sci. 2007; 2:13. PMC: 1865551. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-13. View

3.
Hartnell C, Ou A, Kinicki A . Organizational culture and organizational effectiveness: a meta-analytic investigation of the competing values framework's theoretical suppositions. J Appl Psychol. 2011; 96(4):677-94. DOI: 10.1037/a0021987. View

4.
Thorndike R . STUDYING CANONICAL ANALYSIS: COMMENTS ON BARCIKOWSKI AND STEVENS. Multivariate Behav Res. 2016; 11(2):249-53. DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1102_10. View