» Articles » PMID: 24667212

Changes in HbA1c Level over a 12-week Follow-up in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Following a Medication Change

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Mar 27
PMID 24667212
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Current guidance about the interval needed before retesting HbA1c when monitoring for glycaemic control is based on expert opinion rather than well-powered studies. The aim of our work was to explore how fast HbA1c changes after a change in glucose-lowering medication. This has implications for whether routine HbA1c testing intervals before 12 weeks could inform diabetes medication adjustments.

Methods: This 12-week cohort study recruited patients from 18 general practices in the United Kingdom with non-insulin treated diabetes who were initiating or changing dose of oral glucose-lowering medication. HbA1c was measured at baseline and 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after recruitment. HbA1c levels at earlier time intervals were correlated with 12-week HbA1c. A ROC curve analysis was used to identify the 8-week threshold above which medication adjustment may be clinically appropriate.

Results: Ninety-three patients were recruited to the study. Seventy-nine patients with no change in medication and full 12-week follow-up had the following baseline characteristics: mean ± standard deviation age of 61.3 ± 10.8 years, 34% were female and diabetes duration of 6.0 ± 4.3 years. Mean HbA1c at baseline, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks was 8.7 ± 1.5%, (72.0 ± 16.8 mmol/mol) 8.6 ± 1.6% (70.7 ± 17.0 mmol/mol), 8.4 ± 1.5% (68.7 ± 15.9 mmol/mol), 8.2 ± 1.4% (66.3 ± 15.8 mmol/mol) and 8.1 ± 1.4% (64.8 ± 15.7 mmol/mol) respectively. At the end of the study 61% of patients had sub-optimal glycaemic control (HbA1c>7.5% or 59 mmol/mol). The 8-week change correlated significantly with the 12-week change in HbA1c and an HbA1c above 8.2% (66 mmol/mol) at 8 weeks correctly classified all 28 patients who had not achieved glycaemic control by 12 weeks.

Conclusions/interpretation: This is the first study designed with sufficient power to examine short-term changes in HbA1c. The 12-week change in HbA1c can be predicted 8 weeks after a medication change. Many participants who had not achieved glycaemic control after 12 weeks may have benefitted from an earlier review of their HbA1c and medication.

Citing Articles

The Role of HbA1c in the Follow-Up and Control of Diabetes Mellitus.

Ghanem S, Abdulkreem E, Alfurayh M, Ahmed A, Rikabi H Cureus. 2025; 17(2):e78357.

PMID: 40034631 PMC: 11875672. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78357.


The Food Resources and Kitchen Skills intervention: Protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Pena A, Dawkins E, Adams M, Moser L, Carter A, Rivera R PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0314275.

PMID: 39913390 PMC: 11801624. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314275.


[Diabetes mellitus and total joint arthroplasty-What should be considered?].

Muller M, Weber P Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2025; 54(2):129-134.

PMID: 39774718 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-024-04598-0.


Developing and assessing the "MultiLife" intervention: a mobile health-based lifestyle toolkit for cardiometabolic multimorbidity in diabetes and hypertension management - a type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial protocol.

Pati S, Menon J, Rehman T, Agrawal R, Kshatri J, Palo S BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):3.

PMID: 39748357 PMC: 11694374. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20922-x.


Beneficial Effects of Ursodeoxycholic Acid on Metabolic Parameters and Oxidative Stress in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study.

Lakic B, Skrbic R, Uletilovic S, Mandic-Kovacevic N, Grabez M, Saric M J Diabetes Res. 2024; 2024:4187796.

PMID: 38455850 PMC: 10919985. DOI: 10.1155/2024/4187796.


References
1.
Sacks D, Arnold M, Bakris G, Bruns D, Horvath A, Kirkman M . Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem. 2011; 57(6):e1-e47. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.161596. View

2.
Mortensen H, Christophersen C . Glucosylation of human haemoglobin a in red blood cells studied in vitro. Kinetics of the formation and dissociation of haemoglobin A1c. Clin Chim Acta. 1983; 134(3):317-26. DOI: 10.1016/0009-8981(83)90370-4. View

3.
Kennedy L, Herman W, Strange P, Harris A . Impact of active versus usual algorithmic titration of basal insulin and point-of-care versus laboratory measurement of HbA1c on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: the Glycemic Optimization with Algorithms and Labs at Point of Care.... Diabetes Care. 2005; 29(1):1-8. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.29.01.06.dc05-1058. View

4.
Lyon A, Higgins T, Wesenberg J, Tran D, Cembrowski G . Variation in the frequency of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) testing: population studies used to assess compliance with clinical practice guidelines and use of HbA1c to screen for diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010; 3(3):411-7. PMC: 2769871. DOI: 10.1177/193229680900300302. View

5.
Akan P, Cimrin D, Ormen M, Kume T, Ozkaya A, Ergor G . The inappropriate use of HbA1c testing to monitor glycemia: is there evidence in laboratory data?. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007; 13(1):21-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00641.x. View