» Articles » PMID: 24661390

Randomized Trial of 'intelligent' Autotitrating Ventilation Versus Standard Pressure Support Non-invasive Ventilation: Impact on Adherence and Physiological Outcomes

Overview
Journal Respirology
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2014 Mar 26
PMID 24661390
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objective: Effective non-invasive ventilation (NIV) therapy is dependent on optimal ventilator settings to maximize clinical benefit and patient tolerance. Intelligent volume-assured pressure support (iVAPS) is a hybrid mode of servoventilation, providing constant automatic adjustment of pressure support (PS) to achieve a target ventilation determined by the patient's requirements. In a randomized crossover trial, we tested the hypothesis that iVAPS, with automated selection of ventilator settings, was non-inferior to standard PS ventilation, with settings determined by an experienced health-care professional, for controlling nocturnal hypoventilation in patients naive to NIV.

Methods: Eighteen patients referred to a ventilator clinic with chronic obstructive or restrictive lung disease and newly diagnosed nocturnal hypoventilation (10 male, median (interquartile range): age 54(41-61) years, mean daytime PaO2 9.25(8.59-10.31) kPa, -PaCO2 6.38(5.93-6.65) kPa were randomized to iVAPS and standard PS. Polysomnography with transcutaneous CO2 monitoring was performed at baseline and 1 month after each treatment period. Nightly hours of therapy were recorded by the ventilator.

Results: iVAPS delivered a lower median PS compared with standard PS (8.3(5.6-10.4) vs 10.0(9.0-11.4) cmH2 O; P = 0.001) for the same ventilatory outcome (mean overnight: SpO2 96(95-98) vs 96(93-97)%; P = 0.13 and PtcCO2 6.5(5.8-6.8) vs 6.2(5.8-6.9); P = 0.54). There was no difference in outcome between ventilator modes for spirometry, respiratory muscle strength, sleep quality, arousals or O2 desaturation index. Adherence was greater with iVAPS (5:40(4:42-6:49) vs 4:20(2:27-6:17) hh:mm/night; P = 0.004).

Conclusions: iVAPS servoventilation with automation of ventilation settings is as effective as PS ventilation initiated by a skilled health-care professional in controlling nocturnal hypoventilation and produced better overnight adherence in patients naive to NIV.

Citing Articles

A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation Combined With Pressure Support Ventilation in Treating Chronic Heart Failure.

Zhang X, Dong Y, Diao D, Li M Clin Cardiol. 2025; 48(1):e70041.

PMID: 39817584 PMC: 11736625. DOI: 10.1002/clc.70041.


Hypercapnia as an absolute exclusion criteria for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction.

Burgei J, Alsheimer K, Lantry J, Swalih M, Hehn B Respir Med Case Rep. 2024; 51:102100.

PMID: 39295634 PMC: 11408847. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2024.102100.


Clinical review of non-invasive ventilation.

Criner G, Gayen S, Zantah M, Dominguez Castillo E, Naranjo M, Lashari B Eur Respir J. 2024; 64(5).

PMID: 39227076 PMC: 11540995. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00396-2024.


Australasian Sleep Association 2024 guidelines for sleep studies in adults.

Ellender C, Ruehland W, Duce B, Joyce R, Worsnop C, Mercer J Sleep. 2024; 47(10).

PMID: 38721674 PMC: 11467053. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsae107.


Effectiveness of long-term noninvasive ventilation measured by remote monitoring in neuromuscular disease.

Orr J, Chen K, Vaida F, Schmickl C, Laverty C, Ravits J ERJ Open Res. 2023; 9(5).

PMID: 37753280 PMC: 10518857. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00163-2023.