» Articles » PMID: 24658485

Prevalence of Chronic Pelvic Pain Among Women: an Updated Review

Overview
Journal Pain Physician
Date 2014 Mar 25
PMID 24658485
Citations 115
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP), defined as a noncyclical pain lasting for more than 6 months can lead to lower physical performance and quality of life in women. CPP is a worldwide problem affecting women of all ages. However, health care professionals and researchers, due to its complex nature and the lack of knowledge surrounding the condition, frequently neglect CPP. Subsequently, basic data and knowledge regarding CPP remain incomplete.

Objective: To update the review of the worldwide estimation of the CPP prevalence considering the World Health Organization systematic review by Latthe et al in 2006 as point of departure.

Study Design: A systematic review of CPP prevalence studies.

Method: Electronic search was performed to find related articles through PubMed between 2005 and 2012 based on the PRISMA statement (2009).

Results: From 140 studies, only 7 studies were about CPP prevalence. Their study design consisted of 3 cross sectional studies, one population based mailing questionnaire study, one survey study (computer assisted telephone interview), one data analysis by questionnaire, and one prospective community based study.

Limitations: Paucity of population based studies in addition to probability of existence of studies at the local level with limited access to worldwide databases, lack of consensus about definition of CPP among researchers and therapists, and non-inclusion of CPP related key words in databases such as PubMed.

Conclusion: Based on these articles, prevalence in general ranged between 5.7% and 26.6%. There were many countries and regions without basic data in the field of CPP. This review shows the paucity of studies, especially multidisciplinary researches with multifactorial views on CPP. Multidisciplinary studies would provide more reliable data for estimating the prevalence of CPP and its psycho-socioeconomic burden, as well as finding its etiologies and characteristics. This would be the first step towards better treatment and care for women with CPP.

Citing Articles

Trajectories of mHealth-Tracked Mental Health and Their Predictors in Female Chronic Pelvic Pain Disorders.

Leventhal E, Nukavarapu N, Elhadad N, Bakken S, Elovitz M, Hirten R J Pain Res. 2025; 18:899-913.

PMID: 40034107 PMC: 11873024. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S499102.


Self-reported and tracker-estimated physical activity outcomes in women with chronic pelvic pain disorders: A longitudinal evaluation of construct validity.

Nagaldinne T, Shahnawaz S, Bakken S, Elhadad N, Horan E, Ewing-Garber C medRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39990544 PMC: 11844612. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.10.25322006.


The Interplay Between Chronic Pelvic Pain and Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Micussi M, Minassian V, Ghandour R, Miranne J Int Urogynecol J. 2025; .

PMID: 39903235 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-06040-7.


Validity and Reliability of the Hungarian Version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire Among Women with Endometriosis and Chronic Pelvic Pain.

Kovacs-Szabo Z, Makai A, Acs P, Hock M Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2025; 6(1):69-77.

PMID: 39882142 PMC: 11773173. DOI: 10.1089/whr.2024.0109.


The Evil Twins of Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Interstitial Cystitis/Painful Bladder Syndrome and Endometriosis.

Inzoli A, Barba M, Costa C, Carazita V, Cola A, Fantauzzi M Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(23).

PMID: 39685025 PMC: 11641437. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12232403.