» Articles » PMID: 24658093

Pre-impact Fall Detection: Optimal Sensor Positioning Based on a Machine Learning Paradigm

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Mar 25
PMID 24658093
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify the best subset of body segments that provides for a rapid and reliable detection of the transition from steady walking to a slipping event. Fifteen healthy young subjects managed unexpected perturbations during walking. Whole-body 3D kinematics was recorded and a machine learning algorithm was developed to detect perturbation events. In particular, the linear acceleration of all the body segments was parsed by Independent Component Analysis and a Neural Network was used to classify walking from unexpected perturbations. The Mean Detection Time (MDT) was 351±123 ms with an Accuracy of 95.4%. The procedure was repeated with data related to different subsets of all body segments whose variability appeared strongly influenced by the perturbation-induced dynamic modifications. Accordingly, feet and hands accounted for most data information and the performance of the algorithm were slightly reduced using their combination. Results support the hypothesis that, in the framework of the proposed approach, the information conveyed by all the body segments is redundant to achieve effective fall detection, and suitable performance can be obtained by simply observing the kinematics of upper and lower distal extremities. Future studies are required to assess the extent to which such results can be reproduced in older adults and in different experimental conditions.

Citing Articles

High-Specificity Digital Architecture for Real-Time Recognition of Loss of Balance Inducing Fall.

De Venuto D, Mezzina G Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(3).

PMID: 32023861 PMC: 7038501. DOI: 10.3390/s20030769.


Effective Synchronization of EEG and EMG for Mobile Brain/Body Imaging in Clinical Settings.

Artoni F, Barsotti A, Guanziroli E, Micera S, Landi A, Molteni F Front Hum Neurosci. 2018; 11:652.

PMID: 29379427 PMC: 5770891. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00652.


Pre-impact fall detection.

Hu X, Qu X Biomed Eng Online. 2016; 15(1):61.

PMID: 27251528 PMC: 4888654. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-016-0194-x.

References
1.
Marigold D, Misiaszek J . Whole-body responses: neural control and implications for rehabilitation and fall prevention. Neuroscientist. 2009; 15(1):36-46. DOI: 10.1177/1073858408322674. View

2.
Stolze H, Klebe S, Zechlin C, Baecker C, Friege L, Deuschl G . Falls in frequent neurological diseases--prevalence, risk factors and aetiology. J Neurol. 2004; 251(1):79-84. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-004-0276-8. View

3.
Aziz O, Robinovitch S . An analysis of the accuracy of wearable sensors for classifying the causes of falls in humans. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2011; 19(6):670-6. PMC: 3422363. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2162250. View

4.
Wu G . Distinguishing fall activities from normal activities by velocity characteristics. J Biomech. 2000; 33(11):1497-500. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00117-2. View

5.
Luciani L, Genovese V, Monaco V, Odetti L, Cattin E, Micera S . Design and evaluation of a new mechatronic platform for assessment and prevention of fall risks. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012; 9:51. PMC: 3453503. DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-51. View