» Articles » PMID: 24650058

A New Prognostic Model to Predict Dropout from the Waiting List in Cirrhotic Candidates for Liver Transplantation with MELD Score <18

Abstract

Background & Aims: The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) is used for organ allocation in liver transplantation (LT), but its prognostic performance is less accurate in patients with low score. We assess the outcome of patients with MELD < 18 awaiting LT, finding prognostic variables to identify a high dropout risk.

Methods: Training set consisted of 277 patients and validation cohort of 292 patients. Competing risk regression analysis, taking into account LT, was used for univariate/multivariate analysis.

Results: Ascites, sodium, bilirubin, albumin and glomerular filtration rate were independently associated with a 12-month dropout risk in the training set. Combining these five prognostic parameters, we calculated a new score named liver-renal-risk (LIRER). In the validation set, the 12-month LIRER concordance index showed a discrimination power [0.798, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.793-0.803] better than MELD (0.582, 95% CI 0.575-0.588), Child-Turcotte-Pugh (0.687, 95% CI 0.681-0.693), MELD-sodium (0.721, 95% CI 0.715-0.727) and MELD-ascites-sodium (0.729, 95% CI 0.724-0.735), with a remarkable calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test: P = 0.91; R(2) = 0.911). Considering all study patients, the risk of wait list dropout increased with the rise in LIRER. The survival benefit analysis comparing the wait list dropout risk with the mortality of the 216 transplanted patients with same LIRER showed an important benefit for LT in patients with LIRER > 15.9.

Conclusions: In patients with low MELD (<18), combination of ascites, sodium, albumin, bilirubin and renal function in a new score (LIRER) discriminates patients at high risk of medium-term adverse outcome from those in whom LT may be safely deferred.

Citing Articles

Living donor liver transplantation versus donation after brain death and donation after circulatory death liver transplantation in the US.

Black M, Gupta A, Asrani S, Ma T, Testa G, Wall A Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022; 35(3):273-277.

PMID: 35518809 PMC: 9037473. DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2034202.


A Prospective Multicenter Study of the Chinese Scoring System for Hepatitis B Liver Failure.

Zhe-Bin W, Bing-Liang L, Liang P, Zhi C, Xin-Xin Z, De-Ming T Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8:751807.

PMID: 34796187 PMC: 8592973. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.751807.


A Comprehensive Review of Outcome Predictors in Low MELD Patients.

Mazumder N, Atiemo K, Kappus M, Cullaro G, Harinstein M, Ladner D Transplantation. 2019; 104(2):242-250.

PMID: 31517785 PMC: 6994330. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002956.


Accuracy of the Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease Score in Estimating Pretransplant Mortality Among Pediatric Liver Transplant Candidates.

Chang C, Bryce C, Shneider B, Yabes J, Ren Y, Zenarosa G JAMA Pediatr. 2018; 172(11):1070-1077.

PMID: 30242345 PMC: 6248160. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2541.


Child-Pugh Versus MELD Score for the Assessment of Prognosis in Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Peng Y, Qi X, Guo X Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(8):e2877.

PMID: 26937922 PMC: 4779019. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002877.