» Articles » PMID: 24642283

Recalibration of Inhibitory Control Systems During Walking-related Dual-task Interference: a Mobile Brain-body Imaging (MOBI) Study

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2014 Mar 20
PMID 24642283
Citations 62
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Walking while simultaneously performing cognitively demanding tasks such as talking or texting are typical complex behaviors in our daily routines. Little is known about neural mechanisms underlying cortical resource allocation during such mobile actions, largely due to portability limitations of conventional neuroimaging technologies. We applied an EEG-based Mobile Brain-Body Imaging (MOBI) system that integrates high-density event-related potential (ERP) recordings with simultaneously acquired foot-force sensor data to monitor gait patterns and brain activity. We compared behavioral and ERP measures associated with performing a Go/NoGo response-inhibition task under conditions where participants (N=18) sat in a stationary way, walked deliberately or walked briskly. This allowed for assessment of effects of increasing dual-task load (i.e. walking speed) on neural indices of inhibitory control. Stride time and variability were also measured during inhibitory task performance and compared to stride parameters without task performance, thereby assessing reciprocal dual-task effects on gait parameters. There were no task performance differences between sitting and either walking condition, indicating that participants could perform both tasks simultaneously without suffering dual-task costs. However, participants took longer strides under dual-task load, likely indicating an adaptive mechanism to reduce inter-task competition for cortical resources. We found robust differences in amplitude, latency and topography of ERP components (N2 and P3) associated with inhibitory control between the sitting and walking conditions. Considering that participants showed no dual-task performance costs, we suggest that observed neural alterations under increasing task-load represent adaptive recalibration of the inhibitory network towards a more controlled and effortful processing mode, thereby optimizing performance under dual-task situations.

Citing Articles

Effects of Twelve Weeks of Square Stepping Exercises on Physical and Cognitive Function and Plasma Content of SMP30: A Randomised Control Trial.

Franco-Garcia J, Perez-Gomez J, Castillo-Paredes A, Redondo P, Rojo-Ramos J, Mayordomo-Pinilla N Geriatrics (Basel). 2025; 10(1).

PMID: 39997521 PMC: 11855813. DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics10010022.


Preprocessing choices for P3 analyses with mobile EEG: A systematic literature review and interactive exploration.

Jacobsen N, Kristanto D, Welp S, Inceler Y, Debener S Psychophysiology. 2024; 62(1):e14743.

PMID: 39697161 PMC: 11656290. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14743.


It's all in the timing: delayed feedback in autism may weaken predictive mechanisms during contour integration.

Knight E, Altschuler T, Molholm S, Murphy J, Freedman E, Foxe J J Neurophysiol. 2024; 132(3):628-642.

PMID: 38958283 PMC: 11427042. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00058.2024.


Linking Dementia Pathology and Alteration in Brain Activation to Complex Daily Functional Decline During the Preclinical Dementia Stages: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

De Sanctis P, Mahoney J, Wagner J, Blumen H, Mowrey W, Ayers E JMIR Res Protoc. 2024; 13:e56726.

PMID: 38842914 PMC: 11190628. DOI: 10.2196/56726.


A systematic review of mobile brain/body imaging studies using the P300 event-related potentials to investigate cognition beyond the laboratory.

Grasso-Cladera A, Bremer M, Ladouce S, Parada F Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024; 24(4):631-659.

PMID: 38834886 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-024-01190-z.


References
1.
Gramann K, Gwin J, Ferris D, Oie K, Jung T, Lin C . Cognition in action: imaging brain/body dynamics in mobile humans. Rev Neurosci. 2011; 22(6):593-608. DOI: 10.1515/RNS.2011.047. View

2.
Molholm S, Ritter W, Murray M, Javitt D, Schroeder C, Foxe J . Multisensory auditory-visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002; 14(1):115-28. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00066-6. View

3.
Kramer A, Wickens C, Donchin E . An analysis of the processing requirements of a complex perceptual-motor task. Hum Factors. 1983; 25(6):597-621. DOI: 10.1177/001872088302500601. View

4.
Kok A . On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology. 2001; 38(3):557-77. DOI: 10.1017/s0048577201990559. View

5.
GUTHRIE D, BUCHWALD J . Significance testing of difference potentials. Psychophysiology. 1991; 28(2):240-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1991.tb00417.x. View