» Articles » PMID: 24639031

Relative Risk Estimates from Spatial and Space-time Scan Statistics: Are They Biased?

Overview
Journal Stat Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Public Health
Date 2014 Mar 19
PMID 24639031
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purely spatial and space-time scan statistics have been successfully used by many scientists to detect and evaluate geographical disease clusters. Although the scan statistic has high power in correctly identifying a cluster, no study has considered the estimates of the cluster relative risk in the detected cluster. In this paper, we evaluate whether there is any bias on these estimated relative risks. Intuitively, one may expect that the estimated relative risks has upward bias, because the scan statistic cherry picks high rate areas to include in the cluster. We show that this intuition is correct for clusters with low statistical power, but with medium to high power, the bias becomes negligible. The same behavior is not observed for the prospective space-time scan statistic, where there is an increasing conservative downward bias of the relative risk as the power to detect the cluster increases.

Citing Articles

Geographic inequalities and factors associated with unfavorable outcomes in diabetes-tuberculosis and diabetes-covid comorbidities in Brazil.

Alves L, Berra T, Alves Y, Ferezin L, Vinci A, Tavares R Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8353.

PMID: 40069306 PMC: 11897301. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-93476-6.


Comparative evaluation of spatiotemporal methods for effective dengue cluster detection with a case study of national surveillance data in Thailand.

Rotejanaprasert C, Chinpong K, Lawson A, Maude R Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31064.

PMID: 39730684 PMC: 11680836. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82212-1.


Long-Term Effect of Temperature Increase on Liver Cancer in Australia: A Bayesian Spatial Analysis.

Gan T, Bambrick H, Li Y, Ebi K, Hu W Environ Health Perspect. 2024; 132(9):97007.

PMID: 39269729 PMC: 11398296. DOI: 10.1289/EHP14574.


Spatial patterns and sociodemographic predictors of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Florida.

Howard S, Odoi A PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17771.

PMID: 39104363 PMC: 11299531. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17771.


Geographic disparities in COVID-19 testing and outcomes in Florida.

Khan M, Odoi A, Odoi E BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):79.

PMID: 36631768 PMC: 9832260. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14450-9.


References
1.
Assuncao R, Costa M, Tavares A, Ferreira S . Fast detection of arbitrarily shaped disease clusters. Stat Med. 2006; 25(5):723-42. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2411. View

2.
Chaput E, Meek J, Heimer R . Spatial analysis of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis near Lyme, Connecticut. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002; 8(9):943-8. PMC: 2732548. DOI: 10.3201/eid0809.020103. View

3.
Norstrom M, Pfeiffer D, Jarp J . A space-time cluster investigation of an outbreak of acute respiratory disease in Norwegian cattle herds. Prev Vet Med. 2000; 47(1-2):107-19. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(00)00159-8. View

4.
Hjalmars U, Kulldorff M, Gustafsson G, Nagarwalla N . Childhood leukaemia in Sweden: using GIS and a spatial scan statistic for cluster detection. Stat Med. 1996; 15(7-9):707-15. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19960415)15:7/9<707::aid-sim242>3.0.co;2-4. View

5.
Thomas A, Carlin B . Late detection of breast and colorectal cancer in Minnesota counties: an application of spatial smoothing and clustering. Stat Med. 2002; 22(1):113-27. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1215. View