Sex-related Differences in Access to Care Among Patients with Premature Acute Coronary Syndrome
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Access to care may be implicated in disparities between men and women in death after acute coronary syndrome, especially among younger adults. We aimed to assess sex-related differences in access to care among patients with premature acute coronary syndrome and to identify clinical and gender-related determinants of access to care.
Methods: We studied 1123 patients (18-55 yr) admitted to hospital for acute coronary syndrome and enrolled in the GENESIS-PRAXY cohort study. Outcome measures were door-to-electrocardiography, door-to-needle and door-to-balloon times, as well as proportions of patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, reperfusion or nonprimary percutaneous coronary intervention. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify clinical and gender-related determinants of timely procedures and use of invasive procedures.
Results: Women were less likely than men to receive care within benchmark times for electrocardiography (≤ 10 min: 29% v. 38%, p = 0.02) or fibrinolysis (≤ 30 min: 32% v. 57%, p = 0.01). Women with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) were less likely than men to undergo reperfusion therapy (primary percutaneous coronary intervention or fibrinolysis) (83% v. 91%, p = 0.01), and women with non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina were less likely to undergo nonprimary percutaneous coronary intervention (48% v. 66%, p < 0.001). Clinical determinants of poorer access to care included anxiety, increased number of risk factors and absence of chest pain. Gender-related determinants included feminine traits of personality and responsibility for housework.
Interpretation: Among younger adults with acute coronary syndrome, women and men had different access to care. Moreover, fewer than half of men and women with ST-segment elevation MI received timely primary coronary intervention. Our results also highlight that men and women with no chest pain and those with anxiety, several traditional risk factors and feminine personality traits were at particularly increased risk of poorer access to care.
Gomez J, Park D, Eder M, An S, Lowenstern A, Kelsey M Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2025; 38(2):159-169.
PMID: 39990004 PMC: 11845020. DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2452113.
Mehrabadi A, Yu Y, Grandi S, Platt R, Filion K Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025; 104(2):331-341.
PMID: 39744821 PMC: 11782068. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.15022.
Gender should be considered and reported in epidemiology, but why should it be measured?.
Messing K, Lederer V Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024; 43:100985.
PMID: 39040527 PMC: 11262168. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100985.
Parry M, Owadally T, OHara A, Nickerson N, Hart D CJC Open. 2024; 6(2Part B):485-502.
PMID: 38487065 PMC: 10935688. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.12.016.
Sex, Gender, and Women's Heart Health: How Women's Heart Programs Address the Knowledge Gap.
Parvand M, Ghadiri S, Theberge E, Comber L, Mullen K, Bhalla N CJC Open. 2024; 6(2Part B):442-453.
PMID: 38487062 PMC: 10935996. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.10.012.