» Articles » PMID: 24633966

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Improves Survival of Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Overview
Journal Cancer
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Oncology
Date 2014 Mar 18
PMID 24633966
Citations 71
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: High-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is frequently upstaged after surgery and is associated with uniformly poor survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may offer a way to improve clinical outcomes. The authors compared the survival rates of patients with UTUC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery with the rates among patients who did not.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients with high-risk UTUC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery from 2004 to 2008 (study group) compared with a matched cohort who underwent initial surgery from 1993 to 2003 (control group). Fisher exact tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and Kaplan-Meier methods were used. The log-rank test and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to evaluate the association of the 2 outcomes with patient, treatment, and tumor characteristics in univariate and multivariate models.

Results: Of 112 patients, there were 31 in the study group and 81 in the control group. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy had improved overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) with a 5-year DSS rate of 90.1% and a 5-year OS rate of 80.2% versus DSS and OS rates of 57.6% for those who underwent initial surgery (P = .0204 and P = .0015, respectively). In multivariate analyses, the neoadjuvant group had a lower risk of mortality (OS: hazard ratio, 0.42 [P = .035]; DSS: hazard ratio, 0.19 [P = .006]).

Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improved the survival of patients with UTUC compared with a matched historic cohort of patients who underwent initial surgery. Patients with high-risk UTUC should be considered for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in view of the limited opportunity to administer effective cisplatin-based chemotherapy after nephroureterectomy.

Citing Articles

Predicting pathological upstaging after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: results from a multicenter cohort study.

Yamaguchi R, Kagawa H, Yoshihara K, Yamamoto S, Hara S, Miyajima K Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(11):2384-2395.

PMID: 39698572 PMC: 11650334. DOI: 10.21037/tau-24-357.


Case report: Radical robotic nephroureterectomy after chemotherapy followed by avelumab in a patient with node-positive UTUC.

Studentova H, Student Jr V, Kurfurstova D, Kopova A, Melichar B Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1465213.

PMID: 39588312 PMC: 11586231. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1465213.


Predictors of recurrence and patterns of failure among patients treated with nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Hughes R, Lucas J, Krane L, Divers J, Hemal A, Frizzell B Cancer Treat Commun. 2024; 5:39-45.

PMID: 39363914 PMC: 11449456. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrc.2015.12.004.


Urothelial cancer: state of art in Ukraine and improvement pathways.

Pikul M, Gordiichuk P, Stakhovsky E Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024; 86(9):5137-5144.

PMID: 39238972 PMC: 11374189. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002424.


Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Population Based Analysis.

Venkat S, Lewicki P, Basourakos S, Scherr D Bladder Cancer. 2024; 7(4):401-412.

PMID: 38993989 PMC: 11181789. DOI: 10.3233/BLC-211515.


References
1.
Lughezzani G, Jeldres C, Isbarn H, Sun M, Shariat S, Alasker A . Nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy in the treatment of invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a population-based study of 2299 patients. Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45(18):3291-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.06.016. View

2.
Margulis V, Shariat S, Matin S, Kamat A, Zigeuner R, Kikuchi E . Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: a series from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration. Cancer. 2009; 115(6):1224-33. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24135. View

3.
Eylert M, Hounsome L, Verne J, Bahl A, Jefferies E, Persad R . Prognosis is deteriorating for upper tract urothelial cancer: data for England 1985-2010. BJU Int. 2013; 112(2):E107-13. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12025. View

4.
Fritsche H, Novara G, Burger M, Gupta A, Matsumoto K, Kassouf W . Macroscopic sessile tumor architecture is a pathologic feature of biologically aggressive upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2010; 30(5):666-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.07.010. View

5.
Favaretto R, Shariat S, Savage C, Godoy G, Chade D, Kaag M . Combining imaging and ureteroscopy variables in a preoperative multivariable model for prediction of muscle-invasive and non-organ confined disease in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. BJU Int. 2011; 109(1):77-82. PMC: 4319659. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10288.x. View