» Articles » PMID: 24628615

Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device in Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms: Initial Experience with Short-term Follow-up Results

Overview
Journal J Neurosurg
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2014 Mar 18
PMID 24628615
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Object: Flow diverter (FD) stents are relatively new and important devices in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. The Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device has been recently released for clinical use. The authors' aim in this paper is to report their initial single-center FRED experience with short-term results.

Methods: Between February 2012 and May 2013, 33 patients with 37 aneurysms (35 unruptured and 2 previously ruptured aneurysms) were treated with the FRED. Clinical and radiological data of the patients were retrospectively reviewed.

Results: In all patients only 1 device was used without any additional device or material, such as a stent or coil. All procedures were successfully performed. The procedural complication rate was 3% (1 of 33). Thirty patients underwent clinical and radiological follow-up. During the follow-up period, changes in stent morphology, such as "fish mouth" and "foreshortening" phenomena, occurred in 5 patients. The mortality and permanent morbidity rates were 0%. The complete occlusion rates were 32% (6 of 19) at 0-1 month, 67% (8 of 12) at 2-3 months, 80% (4 of 5) at 4-6 months, and 100% (8 of 8) at 7-12 months. The rates for some aneurysms were assessed at more than one time point.

Conclusions: The FRED has an ability to serve neurointerventionalists in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms with its different technical advantages. The occlusion rates with FRED are similar to those with other FD devices. However, these short-term results need to be confirmed with mid- and long-term follow-up results of multicenter large series.

Citing Articles

Image Follow-Up After Flow Diverter Treatment Using Only Ultra-High Resolution CT Angiography with Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction: A Case Report.

Iwata N, Sakamoto M, Sakou T, Uno T, Kurosaki M Yonago Acta Med. 2024; 67(3):254-258.

PMID: 39176194 PMC: 11335917. DOI: 10.33160/yam.2024.08.006.


Neurological outcomes of flow-diverter stent placement for middle cerebral artery aneurysms, with reference to the effects of argatroban on ischemic events: patient series.

Yoshida S, Kazekawa K, Kamatani K, Maruyama K, Takigawa K, Tashiro N J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2024; 8(6).

PMID: 39102752 PMC: 11301586. DOI: 10.3171/CASE24237.


Safety and efficacy of flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) for treatment of intracranial aneurysm; A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Habibi M, Mirjani M, Ahmadzadeh A, Akbari Javar M, Karami S, Ahmadvand M Neuroradiol J. 2024; :19714009241269460.

PMID: 39102710 PMC: 11571416. DOI: 10.1177/19714009241269460.


Comparison of pipeline embolization device and flow redirection endoluminal device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Musmar B, Orscelik A, Salim H, Musmar F, Adeeb N, El Naamani K Interv Neuroradiol. 2024; :15910199241264345.

PMID: 39053432 PMC: 11569761. DOI: 10.1177/15910199241264345.


Comparative Efficacy of Flow Diverter Devices in the Treatment of Carotid Sidewall Intracranial Aneurysms: a Retrospective, Multicenter Study.

Dmytriw A, Salim H, Musmar B, Cancelliere N, Griessenauer C, Regenhardt R Clin Neuroradiol. 2024; 34(4):907-917.

PMID: 39023541 DOI: 10.1007/s00062-024-01435-x.