» Articles » PMID: 24625757

HPV E6/E7 RNA in Situ Hybridization Signal Patterns As Biomarkers of Three-tier Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Mar 15
PMID 24625757
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cervical lesion grading is critical for effective patient management. A three-tier classification (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] grade 1, 2 or 3) based on H&E slide review is widely used. However, for reasons of considerable inter-observer variation in CIN grade assignment and for want of a biomarker validating a three-fold stratification, CAP-ASCCP LAST consensus guidelines recommend a two-tier system: low- or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL or HSIL). In this study, high-risk HPV E6/E7 and p16 mRNA expression patterns in eighty-six CIN lesions were investigated by RNAscope chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH). Specimens were also screened by immunohistochemistry for p16INK4a (clone E6H4), and by tyramide-based CISH for HPV DNA. HPV genotyping was performed by GP5+/6+ PCR combined with cycle-sequencing. Abundant high-risk HPV RNA CISH signals were detected in 26/32 (81.3%) CIN 1, 22/22 (100%) CIN 2 and in 32/32 (100%) CIN 3 lesions. CIN 1 staining patterns were typified (67.7% specimens) by abundant diffusely staining nuclei in the upper epithelial layers; CIN 2 lesions mostly (66.7%) showed a combination of superficial diffuse-stained nuclei and multiple dot-like nuclear and cytoplasmic signals throughout the epithelium; CIN 3 lesions were characterized (87.5%) by multiple dot-like nuclear and cytoplasmic signals throughout the epithelial thickness and absence/scarcity of diffusely staining nuclei (trend across CIN grades: P<0.0001). These data are consistent with productive phase HPV infections exemplifying CIN 1, transformative phase infections CIN 3, whereas CIN 2 shows both productive and transformative phase elements. Three-tier data correlation was not found for the other assays examined. The dual discernment of diffuse and/or dot-like signals together with the assay's high sensitivity for HPV support the use of HPV E6/E7 RNA CISH as an adjunct test for deciding lesion grade when CIN 2 grading may be beneficial (e.g. among young women) or when 'LSIL vs. HSIL' assignment is equivocal.

Citing Articles

Primary lung adenocarcinoma harboring upper mediastinal lymphatic skip metastasis of cervical squamous cell carcinoma: A case report and literature review.

Zhang C, Ye G, Wang X, Huang Y, Huang Q, Liao Y Oncol Lett. 2024; 28(4):481.

PMID: 39161330 PMC: 11332576. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14614.


Histopathological and Virological Findings of a Penile Papilloma in a Japanese Stallion with Equus Caballus Papillomavirus 2 (EcPV2).

Uchida-Fujii E, Kato Y, Ueno T, Numasawa Y, Yusa S, Haga T Pathogens. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 39057823 PMC: 11279536. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13070597.


Visualization of Individual RNA Molecules by Proximity Ligation-Based Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization Assay.

Xia X, Jiang M, Lin C, Ke R Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2822:143-156.

PMID: 38907917 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3918-4_11.


Incidence and Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Human Papillomavirus-independent Invasive Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Cervix: A Morphologic, Immunohistochemical, and Human Papilloma-Virologic Study of 670 Cases.

Stolnicu S, Allison D, Praiss A, Tessier-Cloutier B, Momeni Boroujeni A, Flynn J Am J Surg Pathol. 2023; 47(12):1376-1389.

PMID: 37702216 PMC: 10840845. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002122.


Novel Hybridization Assay for Chromogenic Single-Molecule Detection of Human Papillomavirus E6/E7 mRNA.

Rao X, Zheng L, Wei K, Li M, Jiang M, Qiu J Microbiol Spectr. 2023; :e0389622.

PMID: 36809088 PMC: 10101027. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03896-22.


References
1.
Doorbar J . Papillomavirus life cycle organization and biomarker selection. Dis Markers. 2007; 23(4):297-313. PMC: 3851388. DOI: 10.1155/2007/613150. View

2.
Doorbar J . Molecular biology of human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer. Clin Sci (Lond). 2006; 110(5):525-41. DOI: 10.1042/CS20050369. View

3.
de Roda Husman A, Snijders P, Stel H, van den Brule A, Meijer C, Walboomers J . Processing of long-stored archival cervical smears for human papillomavirus detection by the polymerase chain reaction. Br J Cancer. 1995; 72(2):412-7. PMC: 2033993. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1995.347. View

4.
Crum C . Laboratory management of CIN 2: the consensus is consensus. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008; 130(2):162-4. DOI: 10.1309/GCVB5C4KFV7TFC7F. View

5.
Evans M, Adamson C, Simmons-Arnold L, Cooper K . Touchdown General Primer (GP5+/GP6+) PCR and optimized sample DNA concentration support the sensitive detection of human papillomavirus. BMC Clin Pathol. 2005; 5:10. PMC: 1314887. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6890-5-10. View