Effect of the Phosphine Steric and Electronic Profile on the Rh-promoted Dehydrocoupling of Phosphine-boranes
Overview
Affiliations
The electronic and steric effects in the stoichiometric dehydrocoupling of secondary and primary phosphine-boranes H3B·PR2H [R = 3,5-(CF3)2C6H3; p-(CF3)C6H4; p-(OMe)C6H4; adamantyl, Ad] and H3B·PCyH2 to form the metal-bound linear diboraphosphines H3B·PR2BH2·PR2H and H3B·PRHBH2·PRH2, respectively, are reported. Reaction of [Rh(L)(η(6)-FC6H5)][BAr(F)4] [L = Ph2P(CH2)3PPh2, Ar(F) = 3,5-(CF3)2C6H3] with 2 equiv of H3B·PR2H affords [Rh(L)(H)(σ,η-PR2BH3)(η(1)-H3B·PR2H)][BAr(F)4]. These complexes undergo dehydrocoupling to give the diboraphosphine complexes [Rh(L)(H)(σ,η(2)-PR2·BH2PR2·BH3)][BAr(F)4]. With electron-withdrawing groups on the phosphine-borane there is the parallel formation of the products of B-P cleavage, [Rh(L)(PR2H)2][BAr(F)4], while with electron-donating groups no parallel product is formed. For the bulky, electron rich, H3B·P(Ad)2H no dehydrocoupling is observed, but an intermediate Rh(I) σ phosphine-borane complex is formed, [Rh(L){η(2)-H3B·P(Ad)2H}][BAr(F)4], that undergoes B-P bond cleavage to give [Rh(L){η(1)-H3B·P(Ad)2H}{P(Ad)2H}][BAr(F)4]. The relative rates of dehydrocoupling of H3B·PR2H (R = aryl) show that increasingly electron-withdrawing substituents result in faster dehydrocoupling, but also suffer from the formation of the parallel product resulting from P-B bond cleavage. H3B·PCyH2 undergoes a similar dehydrocoupling process, and gives a mixture of stereoisomers of the resulting metal-bound diboraphosphine that arise from activation of the prochiral P-H bonds, with one stereoisomer favored. This diastereomeric mixture may also be biased by use of a chiral phosphine ligand. The selectivity and efficiencies of resulting catalytic dehydrocoupling processes are also briefly discussed.
Wiebe M, Staubitz A, Manners I Chemistry. 2024; 31(11):e202403849.
PMID: 39672795 PMC: 11840660. DOI: 10.1002/chem.202403849.
Race J, Heyam A, Wiebe M, Diego-Garcia Hernandez J, Ellis C, Lei S Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2022; 62(3):e202216106.
PMID: 36394131 PMC: 10107156. DOI: 10.1002/anie.202216106.
Metathesis by Partner Interchange in σ-Bond Ligands: Expanding Applications of the σ-CAM Mechanism.
Perutz R, Sabo-Etienne S, Weller A Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2021; 61(5):e202111462.
PMID: 34694734 PMC: 9299125. DOI: 10.1002/anie.202111462.
Hooper T, Weller A, Beattie N, Macgregor S Chem Sci. 2018; 7(3):2414-2426.
PMID: 29997783 PMC: 6003611. DOI: 10.1039/c5sc04150c.
Marquardt C, Jurca T, Schwan K, Stauber A, Virovets A, Whittell G Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015; 54(46):13782-6.
PMID: 26427911 PMC: 4648028. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201507084.