» Articles » PMID: 24612523

Global Health Impacts of Policies: Lessons from the UK

Overview
Journal Global Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2014 Mar 12
PMID 24612523
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The UK government committed to undertaking impact assessments of its policies on the health of populations in low and middle-income countries in its cross-government strategy "Health is Global". To facilitate this process, the Department of Health, in collaboration with the National Heart Forum, initiated a project to pilot the use of a global health impact assessment guidance framework and toolkit for policy-makers. This paper aims to stimulate debate about the desirability and feasibility of global health impact assessments by describing and drawing lessons from the first stage of the project.

Discussion: Despite the attraction of being able to assess and address potential global health impacts of policies, there is a dearth of existing information and experience. A literature review was followed by discussions with policy-makers and an online survey about potential barriers, preferred support mechanisms and potential policies on which to pilot the toolkit. Although policy-makers were willing to engage in hypothetical discussions about the methodology, difficulties in identifying potential pilots suggest a wider problem in encouraging take up without legislative imperatives. This is reinforced by the findings of the survey that barriers to uptake included lack of time, resources and expertise. We identified three lessons for future efforts to mainstream global health impact assessments: 1) Identify a lead government department and champion--to some extent, this role was fulfilled by the Department of Health, however, it lacked a high-level cross-government mechanism to support implementation. 2) Ensure adequate resources and consider embedding the goals and principles of global health impact assessments into existing processes to maximise those resources. 3) Develop an effective delivery mechanism involving both state actors, and non-state actors who can ensure a "voice" for constituencies who are affected by government policies and also provide the "demand" for the assessments.

Summary: This paper uses the initial stages of a study on global health impact assessments to pose the wider question of incentives for policy-makers to improve global health. It highlights three lessons for successful development and implementation of global health impact assessments in relation to stewardship, resources, and delivery mechanisms.

Citing Articles

Sponge city construction and population health.

Li Y Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1285568.

PMID: 38351962 PMC: 10863046. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1285568.


Implementation of Health Impact Assessment in the Healthcare System of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Kalel Z, Gulis G, Aringazina A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3).

PMID: 36767699 PMC: 9915209. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032335.


China-UK partnership for global health: practices and implications of the Global Health Support Programme 2012-2019.

Wang X, Liu P, Xu T, Chen Y, Yu Y, Chen X Glob Health Res Policy. 2020; 5:13.

PMID: 32206728 PMC: 7083009. DOI: 10.1186/s41256-020-00134-7.


Influence of Alcohol and Red Meat Consumption on Life Expectancy: Results of 164 Countries from 1992 to 2013.

Ranabhat C, Park M, Kim C Nutrients. 2020; 12(2).

PMID: 32059386 PMC: 7071474. DOI: 10.3390/nu12020459.


Towards environmental health equity in health impact assessment: innovations and opportunities.

Buse C, Lai V, Cornish K, Parkes M Int J Public Health. 2018; 64(1):15-26.

PMID: 29911285 DOI: 10.1007/s00038-018-1135-1.

References
1.
Friel S, Marmot M, McMichael A, Kjellstrom T, Vagero D . Global health equity and climate stabilisation: a common agenda. Lancet. 2008; 372(9650):1677-83. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61692-X. View

2.
Gagnon M, Labonte R . Understanding how and why health is integrated into foreign policy - a case study of health is global, a UK Government Strategy 2008-2013. Global Health. 2013; 9:24. PMC: 3680218. DOI: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-24. View

3.
MacNaughton G, Hunt P . Health impact assessment: the contribution of the right to the highest attainable standard of health. Public Health. 2009; 123(4):302-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.09.002. View

4.
Monastersky R . Climate crunch: A burden beyond bearing. Nature. 2009; 458(7242):1091-4. DOI: 10.1038/4581091a. View

5.
Wright J, Parry J, Scully E . Institutionalizing policy-level health impact assessment in Europe: is coupling health impact assessment with strategic environmental assessment the next step forward?. Bull World Health Organ. 2005; 83(6):472-7. PMC: 2626260. DOI: /S0042-96862005000600016. View