» Articles » PMID: 24611599

The Impact of Tiered Physician Networks on Patient Choices

Overview
Journal Health Serv Res
Specialty Health Services
Date 2014 Mar 12
PMID 24611599
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess whether patient choice of physician or health plan was affected by physician tier-rankings.

Data Sources: Administrative claims and enrollment data on 171,581 nonelderly beneficiaries enrolled in Massachusetts Group Insurance Commission health plans that include a tiered physician network and who had an office visit with a tiered physician.

Study Design: We estimate the impact of tier-rankings on physician market share within a plan of new patients and on the percent of a physician's patients who switch to other physicians with fixed effects regression models. The effect of tiering on consumer plan choice is estimated using logistic regression and a pre-post study design.

Principal Findings: Physicians in the bottom (least-preferred) tier, particularly certain specialist physicians, had lower market share of new patient visits than physicians with higher tier-rankings. Patients whose physician was in the bottom tier were more likely to switch health plans. There was no effect of tier-ranking on patients switching away from physicians whom they have seen previously.

Conclusions: The effect of tiering appears to be among patients who choose new physicians and at the lower end of the distribution of tiered physicians, rather than moving patients to the "best" performers. These findings suggest strong loyalty of patients to physicians more likely to be considered their personal doctor.

Citing Articles

How exposure to patient narratives affects stereotyped choices of primary care clinicians.

Bhaumik D, Schlesinger M PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0295243.

PMID: 38060553 PMC: 10703228. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295243.


Tiered Physician Network Plans and Patient Choices of Specialist Physicians.

Prager E, Curto V, Magyari A, Gaye M, Sinaiko A JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(11):e2341836.

PMID: 37943560 PMC: 10636632. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.41836.


Role of prices in driving the variation in spending across medical groups.

Mehrotra A, Parker E, Koep E, Liu P, Chernew M Health Serv Res. 2023; 58(6):1164-1171.

PMID: 37528576 PMC: 10622261. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14207.


Tiered network health plans and changes in physician practice intensity.

Prager E, Sinaiko A Health Serv Res. 2023; 59(1):e14163.

PMID: 37127429 PMC: 10771897. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14163.


Price Effects Of Vertical Integration And Joint Contracting Between Physicians And Hospitals In Massachusetts.

Curto V, Sinaiko A, Rosenthal M Health Aff (Millwood). 2022; 41(5):741-750.

PMID: 35500187 PMC: 10249654. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00727.


References
1.
Scanlon D, Chernew M, Lave J . Consumer health plan choice: current knowledge and future directions. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997; 18:507-28. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.507. View

2.
Scanlon D, Lindrooth R, Christianson J . Steering patients to safer hospitals? The effect of a tiered hospital network on hospital admissions. Health Serv Res. 2008; 43(5 Pt 2):1849-68. PMC: 2654164. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00889.x. View

3.
Draper D, Liebhaber A, Ginsburg P . High-performance health plan networks: early experiences. Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2007; (111):1-6. View

4.
Wang J, Hockenberry J, Chou S, Yang M . Do bad report cards have consequences? Impacts of publicly reported provider quality information on the CABG market in Pennsylvania. J Health Econ. 2011; 30(2):392-407. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.11.006. View

5.
Goldman D, Joyce G, Zheng Y . Prescription drug cost sharing: associations with medication and medical utilization and spending and health. JAMA. 2007; 298(1):61-9. PMC: 6375697. DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.1.61. View