» Articles » PMID: 24609105

Genetic Evidence Confirms Polygamous Mating System in a Crustacean Parasite with Multiple Hosts

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Mar 11
PMID 24609105
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mating systems are diverse in animals, notably in crustaceans, but can be inferred from a limited set of parameters. Baeza and Thiel (2007) proposed a model predicting mating systems of symbiotic crustaceans with three host characteristics and the risk of predation. These authors proposed five mating systems, ranging from monogamy to polygynandry (where multiple mating occurs for both genders). Using microsatellite loci, we tested the putatively mating system of the ectoparasite crab Dissodactylus primitivus. We determined the mating frequencies of males and females, parentage assignment (COLONY & GERUD software) as well as the contents of female spermathecae. Our results are globally consistent with the model of Baeza and Thiel and showed, together with previous aquarium experiments, that this ectoparasite evolved a polygamous mating system where males and females move between hosts for mate search. Parentage analyses revealed that polyandry is frequent and concerns more than 60% of clutches, with clutches being fertilized by up to 6 different fathers. Polygyny is supported by the detection of eight males having sired two different broods. We also detected a significant paternity skew in 92% of the multipaternal broods. Moreover, this skew is probably higher than the estimation from the brood because additional alleles were detected in most of spermathecae. This high skew could be explained by several factors as sperm competition or cryptic female choice. Our genetic data, combined with previous anatomic analyses, provide consistent arguments to suggest sperm precedence in D. primitivus.

Citing Articles

Mating structure of the blue and red shrimp, Aristeus antennatus (Risso, 1816) characterized by relatedness analysis.

Planella L, Vera M, Garcia-Marin J, Heras S, Roldan M Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):7227.

PMID: 31076585 PMC: 6510731. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43523-w.


High levels of polyandry, but limited evidence for multiple paternity, in wild populations of the western rock lobster ().

Loo J, Kennington W, de Lestang S, How J, Evans J Ecol Evol. 2018; 8(9):4525-4533.

PMID: 29760893 PMC: 5938460. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3985.


Highly contrasted population genetic structures in a host-parasite pair in the Caribbean Sea.

Jossart Q, De Ridder C, Lessios H, Bauwens M, Motreuil S, Rigaud T Ecol Evol. 2017; 7(22):9267-9280.

PMID: 29187967 PMC: 5696394. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3413.


Monogamy in a Hyper-Symbiotic Shrimp.

Baeza J, Simpson L, Ambrosio L, Gueron R, Mora N PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0149797.

PMID: 26934109 PMC: 4775069. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149797.


The Opportunity for Post-Copulatory Sexual Selection in the Ectoparasitic Pea Crab, Dissodactylus primitivus (Brachyura: Pinnotheridae).

Prather Jr R, Shuster S PLoS One. 2015; 10(12):e0145681.

PMID: 26701316 PMC: 4689395. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145681.

References
1.
Vogt G . Abbreviation of larval development and extension of brood care as key features of the evolution of freshwater Decapoda. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2012; 88(1):81-116. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00241.x. View

2.
Walsh P, Metzger D, Higuchi R . Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques. 1991; 10(4):506-13. View

3.
Yue G, Li J, Wang C, Xia J, Wang G, Feng J . High prevalence of multiple paternity in the invasive crayfish species, Procambarus clarkii. Int J Biol Sci. 2010; 6(1):107-15. PMC: 2828620. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.6.107. View

4.
Shuster S, Briggs W, Dennis P . How multiple mating by females affects sexual selection. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013; 368(1613):20120046. PMC: 3576580. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0046. View

5.
Streiff R, Mira S, Castro M, Cancela M . Multiple paternity in Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus L.) assessed with microsatellite markers. Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2003; 6(1):60-6. DOI: 10.1007/s10126-003-0015-7. View