» Articles » PMID: 24607786

Spouse and Child Availability for Newly Disabled Older Adults: Socioeconomic Differences and Potential Role of Residential Proximity

Overview
Date 2014 Mar 11
PMID 24607786
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To examine the potential role of child and spousal availability in facilitating community-based care for disabled older adults.

Method: We used the Health and Retirement Study, a nationally representative longitudinal study of older adults. The analysis sample included older adults who were nondisabled at baseline, but who then developed at least one activity of daily living (ADL) limitation over the subsequent 2-year period (N = 2,094). Using multivariate, multinomial logistic regression, we examined the association of child and spouse availability prior to disablement of the older adults with ADL care receipt status after the onset of disablement, after adjusting for other sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

Results: Lower socioeconomic status (SES) was associated with less availability of a spouse but greater availability of children at baseline. Compared with older adults who had no children nearby (i.e., all children lived further than 30 miles), older adults who had at least one child living with or near them prior to the onset of the ADL limitation were less likely to go to a nursing home (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.26 for coresident; AOR: 0.44 for 1- 30 miles) and less likely to depend on formal care (AOR: 0.39 for coresident; AOR: 0.51 for 1-30 miles) after the onset of new ADL limitation/s.

Discussion: Understanding SES variations in the informal care resources, and potential role of child geographic availability, may inform the development of cost-effective community-based care programs and policies.

Citing Articles

Availability of family care resources, bathing assistance and toileting assistance among older adults with functional limitations: an evidence-based study from China.

Zhang J, Shen Z, Tong X, Sun X, Yao N BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):419.

PMID: 38730380 PMC: 11088109. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05047-5.


Geographic Relocation in Response to Parents' Health Shocks: Who Moves and How Close?.

Reyes A, Shang Y J Marriage Fam. 2024; 86(1):49-71.

PMID: 38504764 PMC: 10947064. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12939.


Unaddressed functional difficulty and care support among White, Black, and Hispanic older adults in the last decade.

Li J, Ha J, Hoffman G Health Aff Sch. 2024; 1(3).

PMID: 38274860 PMC: 10809881. DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxad041.


Impact of Care-Recipient Relationship Type on Quality of Life in Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Dementia Over Time.

Lai A, Griffith L, Kuspinar A, Turchyn J, Richardson J J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2023; 37(4):294-306.

PMID: 37950653 PMC: 11089829. DOI: 10.1177/08919887231215044.


Family Ties and Older Adult Well-Being: Incorporating Social Networks and Proximity.

Patterson S, Margolis R J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023; 78(12):2080-2089.

PMID: 37738615 PMC: 10699742. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbad139.


References
1.
Hayman J, Langa K, Kabeto M, Katz S, DeMonner S, Chernew M . Estimating the cost of informal caregiving for elderly patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19(13):3219-25. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.13.3219. View

2.
Wolff J, Kasper J . Caregivers of frail elders: updating a national profile. Gerontologist. 2006; 46(3):344-56. DOI: 10.1093/geront/46.3.344. View

3.
Allen S, Lima J, Goldscheider F, Roy J . Primary caregiver characteristics and transitions in community-based care. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012; 67(3):362-71. PMC: 3325088. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbs032. View

4.
Van Houtven C, Norton E . Informal care and health care use of older adults. J Health Econ. 2004; 23(6):1159-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.04.008. View

5.
Langa K, Fendrick A, Flaherty K, Martinez F, Kabeto M, Saint S . Informal caregiving for chronic lung disease among older Americans. Chest. 2002; 122(6):2197-203. DOI: 10.1378/chest.122.6.2197. View