» Articles » PMID: 24606090

Progesterone Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics with 3 Dosages and 2 Regimens of an Effervescent Micronized Progesterone Vaginal Insert

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2014 Mar 11
PMID 24606090
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: Progesterone vaginal insert (PVI), an effervescent delivery system, dissolves rapidly, is absorbed through the vaginal epithelium, and achieves higher endometrial tissue concentrations than those achieved with progesterone in oil (PIO) given im.

Objective: Our objective was to examine the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PVI compared with PIO.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Fifty-eight healthy premenopausal women were randomized to 50, 100, or 200 mg PVI once daily; 100 or 200 mg PVI twice daily; or 50 to 100 mg PIO via im injection once daily for 10 days. Serum samples were obtained after the first dose; serum and endometrial tissue were obtained after the last dose.

Main Outcome Measures: Maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax, and area under the serum-concentration time curve over the dosing interval were calculated after correcting for baseline progesterone concentrations. ANOVA and paired t test were used to compare results across and within groups.

Results: A higher Cmax was observed after PIO than PVI administration. Endometrial tissue progesterone concentrations were higher for PVI regimens. Time to Cmax was 7.3 hours after PIO and 3.3 to 5.9 hours after PVI. Steady state was achieved within 24 and 48 hours for PVI and PIO regimens, respectively. The area under the curve increased with increasing PVI dosage; however, the increase was not proportional to the increase in dosage. Downregulation of estrogen and progesterone receptors was observed in secretory biopsy specimens.

Conclusion: The PVI system consistently allowed for rapid progesterone absorption and achieved higher endometrial tissue concentrations and lower systemic exposures than observed after im PIO.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Individualized Rescue Luteal Phase Support Strategies with Vaginal and Combined Vaginal & Subcutaneous Progesterone Administration in Artificial Frozen-Thawed Blastocyst Embryo Transfer Cycles Based on Serum Progesterone levels.

Arik Alpcetin S, Ince O, Akcay B, Cevher Akdulum M, Demirdag E, Erdem A Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 15:1503008.

PMID: 39897956 PMC: 11782913. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1503008.


The incorrect conclusion about vaginally administered progesterone: when a randomized clinical trial gets it wrong.

Paulson R F S Rep. 2025; 5(4):339-340.

PMID: 39781067 PMC: 11705577. DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2024.11.003.


Progesterone in frozen embryo transfer cycles: assays, circulating concentrations, metabolites, and molecular action.

Mandelbaum R, Stanczyk F F S Rep. 2024; 5(3):237-247.

PMID: 39381665 PMC: 11456646. DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2024.05.007.


The Impact of Progesterone Administration Routes on Endometrial Receptivity and Clinical Outcomes in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles.

Gajjar H, Banker J, Murarka S, Shah P, Shah N, Bhaskaran L Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e62571.

PMID: 39027776 PMC: 11255535. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.62571.


Individualized luteal phase support in frozen-thawed embryo transfer after intramuscular progesterone administration might rectify live birth rate.

Boynukalin F, Tohma Y, Yarkiner Z, Gultomruk M, Bozdag G, Ozkavukcu S Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1412185.

PMID: 39006366 PMC: 11239543. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1412185.