Reproductive Outcome in Uterine Malformations with or Without an Associated Unilateral Renal Agenesis
Overview
Reproductive Medicine
Affiliations
Objective: To analyze reproductive performance in women with genital malformations and to determine whether pregnancy outcomes are influenced by the asrenal agenesis (URA).
Study Design: This was a retrospective study of 174 patients with genitourinary malformations, with available images for reevaluation and classification and a history ofpregnancies. The main outcome measure was the reproductive performance depending on the type of uterine malformation and urinary tract anomalies.
Results: The lowest percentage of women who had only live births occurred in women with bicornuate unicollis uterus (28%). Considering only uterine anomalies that might be associated with URA, those cases had significantly better perinatal outcomes (72% had only living children) than those with no renal agenesis (40%). Of the total number of pregnancies (n=355), patients with URA were associated with term deliveries and living children, whereas women with uterine malformation without URA were more associated with abortions, premature births, and breech presentation.
Conclusion: Uterine malformations are associated with a high rate of abortions, preterm births, breech presentation, and reproductive losses, but reproductive performance is significantly better for a given type of uterine malformation if it is associated with URA; that is, if the Müllerian anomaly is the consequence of mesonephric or Wolffian anomaly. Different embryological origin for the uterine malformations (mesonephric versus isolated Müllerian anomalies), the absence of 1 renal artery, and previous extrauterine surgery could be related.
Navarro V, Acien M, Acien P J Clin Med. 2024; 13(10).
PMID: 38792529 PMC: 11121905. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13102988.
Caballero Campo M, Perez Milan F, Carrera Roig M, Moratalla Bartolome E, Dominguez Arroyo J, Alcazar Zambrano J Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024; 16(1):9-22.
PMID: 38551471 PMC: 11198883. DOI: 10.52054/FVVO.16.1.004.
Classification of Müllerian anomalies: Is a consensus possible?.
Acien M, Acien P Case Rep Womens Health. 2022; 34:e00413.
PMID: 35496576 PMC: 9046808. DOI: 10.1016/j.crwh.2022.e00413.
Wang G, Zhu L, Liu A, Xu T, Lang J Chin Med J (Engl). 2016; 129(20):2441-2444.
PMID: 27748336 PMC: 5072256. DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.191762.