» Articles » PMID: 24594689

Who is Most Vulnerable to Social Rejection? The Toxic Combination of Low Self-esteem and Lack of Negative Emotion Differentiation on Neural Responses to Rejection

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Mar 6
PMID 24594689
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

People have a fundamental need to belong that, when satisfied, is associated with mental and physical well-being. The current investigation examined what happens when the need to belong is thwarted-and how individual differences in self-esteem and emotion differentiation modulate neural responses to social rejection. We hypothesized that low self-esteem would predict heightened activation in distress-related neural responses during a social rejection manipulation, but that this relationship would be moderated by negative emotion differentiation-defined as adeptness at using discrete negative emotion categories to capture one's felt experience. Combining daily diary and neuroimaging methodologies, the current study showed that low self-esteem and low negative emotion differentiation represented a toxic combination that was associated with stronger activation during social rejection (versus social inclusion) in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula-two regions previously shown to index social distress. In contrast, individuals with greater negative emotion differentiation did not show stronger activation in these regions, regardless of their level of self-esteem; fitting with prior evidence that negative emotion differentiation confers equanimity in emotionally upsetting situations.

Citing Articles

The mediating effect of personal mastery and perceived social support between emotional intelligence and social alienation among patients receiving peritoneal dialysis.

Diao K, Wang J, Zhang Y, Huang Y, Shan Y Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1392224.

PMID: 38939568 PMC: 11210390. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1392224.


Emotion differentiation among individuals in a randomized clinical trial for alcohol use disorder: Within- and between-person associations with affect, craving, and alcohol use in daily life.

Knapp K, Bradizza C, Zhao J, Linn B, Wilding G, LaBarre C Behav Res Ther. 2024; 173:104474.

PMID: 38237447 PMC: 10947467. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2024.104474.


Attached but Lonely: Emotional Intelligence as a Mediator and Moderator between Attachment Styles and Loneliness.

Borawski D, Sojda M, Rychlewska K, Wajs T Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(22).

PMID: 36429549 PMC: 9690062. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192214831.


How different online self-presentations relate to life satisfaction differently in college students: The role of positive online feedback and self-esteem.

Tian L, Zhai R, Dai P, Cui J Curr Psychol. 2022; :1-16.

PMID: 36035249 PMC: 9399981. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-03444-w.


Low self-esteem and the formation of global self-performance estimates in emerging adulthood.

Rouault M, Will G, Fleming S, Dolan R Transl Psychiatry. 2022; 12(1):272.

PMID: 35821225 PMC: 9276660. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-022-02031-8.


References
1.
Mayer J, Salovey P, Caruso D . Emotional intelligence: new ability or eclectic traits?. Am Psychol. 2008; 63(6):503-17. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.6.503. View

2.
Palmieri P, Boden M, Berenbaum H . Measuring clarity of and attention to emotions. J Pers Assess. 2009; 91(6):560-7. DOI: 10.1080/00223890903228539. View

3.
Masten C, Telzer E, Eisenberger N . An FMRI investigation of attributing negative social treatment to racial discrimination. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010; 23(5):1042-51. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21520. View

4.
Taylor S, Brown J . Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychol Bull. 1988; 103(2):193-210. View

5.
Baumeister R, Twenge J, Nuss C . Effects of social exclusion on cognitive processes: anticipated aloneness reduces intelligent thought. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002; 83(4):817-27. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.83.4.817. View