» Articles » PMID: 24588909

Long-acting Versus Standard Non-ergot Dopamine Agonists in Parkinson's Disease: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Pharmacology
Date 2014 Mar 5
PMID 24588909
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of long-acting versus standard non-ergot dopamine agonists (NEDAs) in Parkinson's disease (PD), we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Materials And Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases, and Web of Knowledge were searched up to November 20th 2013. The pooled weighted mean differences (WMDs) and relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results: Eight large-scale RCTs, involving 2402 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the standard NEDAs, long-acting NEDAs exhibited similar improvements in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale activities of daily living (ADL) score (WMD 0.09, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.50), motor score (WMD -0.35, 95% CI -1.60 to 0.90), and "off" time (WMD 0.18, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.50). No differences were found in overall withdrawals (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.32), withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.56), or the ten commonly reported adverse events between the two formulations.

Conclusions: Our meta-analysis showed long-acting NEDAs were noninferior to standard NEDAs in efficacy, tolerability, and safety in the treatment of PD.

Citing Articles

Comparative efficacy and safety of six non-ergot dopamine-receptor agonists in early Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Chen X, Zhang Q, Chen F, Wen S, Zhou C Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1183823.

PMID: 37396766 PMC: 10312085. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1183823.


The Comparative Efficacy of Non-ergot Dopamine Agonist and Potential Risk Factors for Motor Complications and Side Effects From NEDA Use in Early Parkinson's Disease: Evidence From Clinical Trials.

Wu C, Guo H, Xu Y, Li L, Li X, Tang C Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14:831884.

PMID: 35527736 PMC: 9074827. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.831884.


Contemporary Options for the Management of Motor Complications in Parkinson's Disease: Updated Clinical Review.

Cabreira V, Soares-da-Silva P, Massano J Drugs. 2019; 79(6):593-608.

PMID: 30905034 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-019-01098-w.


Current Pharmaceutical Treatments and Alternative Therapies of Parkinson's Disease.

Dong J, Cui Y, Li S, Le W Curr Neuropharmacol. 2015; 14(4):339-55.

PMID: 26585523 PMC: 4876590. DOI: 10.2174/1570159x14666151120123025.


Pramipexole extended-release: a review of its use in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Frampton J Drugs. 2014; 74(18):2175-90.

PMID: 25385556 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-014-0322-5.

References
1.
Bibbiani F, Costantini L, Patel R, Chase T . Continuous dopaminergic stimulation reduces risk of motor complications in parkinsonian primates. Exp Neurol. 2005; 192(1):73-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.11.013. View

2.
Elshoff J, Braun M, Andreas J, Middle M, Cawello W . Steady-state plasma concentration profile of transdermal rotigotine: an integrated analysis of three, open-label, randomized, phase I multiple dose studies. Clin Ther. 2012; 34(4):966-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.02.008. View

3.
Jadad A, Moore R, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds D, Gavaghan D . Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Control Clin Trials. 1996; 17(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4. View

4.
Kulisevsky J, Pagonabarraga J . Tolerability and safety of ropinirole versus other dopamine agonists and levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Drug Saf. 2010; 33(2):147-61. DOI: 10.2165/11319860-000000000-00000. View

5.
Radad K, Gille G, Rausch W . Short review on dopamine agonists: insight into clinical and research studies relevant to Parkinson's disease. Pharmacol Rep. 2005; 57(6):701-12. View