» Articles » PMID: 24586348

Quantitative CT Variables Enabling Response Prediction in Neoadjuvant Therapy with EGFR-TKIs: Are They Different from Those in Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy?

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Mar 4
PMID 24586348
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: To correlate changes of various CT parameters after the neoadjuvant treatment in patients with lung adenocarcinoma with pathologic responses, focused on their relationship with different therapeutic options, particularly of EGFR-TKI and concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) settings.

Materials And Methods: We reviewed pre-operative CT images of primary tumors and surgical specimens obtained after neoadjuvant therapy (TKI, n = 23; CCRT, n = 28) from 51 patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Serial changes in tumor volume, density, mass, skewness/kurtosis, and size-zone variability/intensity variability) were assessed from CT datasets. The changes in CT parameters were correlated with histopathologic responses, and the relationship between CT variables and histopathologic responses was compared between TKI and CCRT groups.

Results: Tumor volume, mass, kurtosis, and skewness were significant predictors of pathologic response in CCRT group in univariate analysis. Using multivariate analysis, kurtosis was found to be independent predictor. In TKI group, intensity variability and size-zone variability were significantly decreased in pathologic responder group. Intensity variability was found to be an independent predictor for pathologic response on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: Quantitative CT variables including histogram or texture analysis have potential as a predictive tool for response evaluation, and it may better reflect treatment response than standard response criteria based on size changes.

Citing Articles

Models and Biomarkers for Local Response Prediction in Early-Stage and Oligometastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Using Machine Learning.

Ramasamy G, Muanza T, Kasymjanova G, Agulnik J Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75819.

PMID: 39816274 PMC: 11734944. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75819.


Analysis of the association between vestibular schwannoma and hearing status using a newly developed radiomics technique.

Lim K, Lee S, Song I, Yoon H, Kim H, Lee Y Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 281(6):2951-2957.

PMID: 38183454 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08410-1.


CT-based radiomics prediction of complete response after stereotactic body radiation therapy for patients with lung metastases.

Cilla S, Pistilli D, Romano C, Macchia G, Pierro A, Arcelli A Strahlenther Onkol. 2023; 199(7):676-685.

PMID: 37256303 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02086-6.


CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of adrenal hyperplasia from lipid-poor adenoma: an exploratory study.

Yuan H, Kang B, Sun K, Qin S, Ji C, Wang X BMC Med Imaging. 2023; 23(1):4.

PMID: 36611159 PMC: 9826591. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00951-x.


Computed tomography-based radiomic model predicts radiological response following stereotactic body radiation therapy in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer and pulmonary oligo-metastases.

Cheung B, Lau K, Lee V, Leung T, Kong F, Luk M Radiat Oncol J. 2022; 39(4):254-264.

PMID: 34986546 PMC: 8743458. DOI: 10.3857/roj.2021.00311.


References
1.
Goh V, Ganeshan B, Nathan P, Juttla J, Vinayan A, Miles K . Assessment of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in metastatic renal cell cancer: CT texture as a predictive biomarker. Radiology. 2011; 261(1):165-71. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110264. View

2.
Yoon H, Lee H, Lee K, Choi Y, Ahn M, Park K . Repeat biopsy for mutational analysis of non-small cell lung cancers resistant to previous chemotherapy: adequacy and complications. Radiology. 2012; 265(3):939-48. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112613. View

3.
Mayr N, Taoka T, Yuh W, Denning L, Zhen W, Paulino A . Method and timing of tumor volume measurement for outcome prediction in cervical cancer using magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002; 52(1):14-22. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01808-9. View

4.
Lee H, Jeong J, Lee K, Yi C, Kim B, Kang H . Histopathology of lung adenocarcinoma based on new IASLC/ATS/ERS classification: prognostic stratification with functional and metabolic imaging biomarkers. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013; 38(4):905-13. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24080. View

5.
Hong J, Chen M, Lin F, Tang S . Prognostic assessment of tumor regression after external irradiation for cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992; 22(5):913-7. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(92)90787-i. View