» Articles » PMID: 24585720

Survival of Patients with Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Treated with FOLFOX/cetuximab or FOLFIRI/cetuximab in a Multidisciplinary Concept (CELIM Study)

Overview
Journal Ann Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Oncology
Date 2014 Mar 4
PMID 24585720
Citations 92
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Initially, unresectable colorectal liver metastases can be resected after response to chemotherapy. While cetuximab has been shown to increase response and resection rates, the survival outcome for this conversion strategy needs further evaluation.

Patients And Methods: Patients with technically unresectable and/or ≥5 liver metastases were treated with FOLFOX/cetuximab (arm A) or FOLFIRI/cetuximab (arm B) and evaluated with regard to resectability every 2 months. Tumour response and secondary resection data have been reported previously. A final analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was carried out in December 2012.

Results: Between December 2004 and March 2008, 56 patients were randomised to arm A, 55 to arm B. The median OS was 35.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) 27.2-44.2] months [arm A: 35.8 (95% CI 28.1-43.6), arm B: 29.0 (95% CI 16.0-41.9) months, HR 1.03 (95% CI 0.66-1.61), P = 0.9]. The median PFS was 10.8 (95% CI 9.3-12.2) months [arm A: 11.2 (95% CI 7.2-15.3), arm B: 10.5 (95% CI 8.9-12.2) months, HR 1.18 (95% CI 0.79-1.74), P = 0.4]. Patients who underwent R0 resection (n = 36) achieved a better median OS [53.9 (95% CI 35.9-71.9) months] than those who did not [21.9 (95% CI 17.1-26.7) months, P < 0.001]. The median disease-free survival for R0 resected patients was 9.9 (95% CI 5.8-14.0) months, and the 5-year OS rate was 46.2% (95% CI 29.5% to 62.9%).

Conclusions: This study confirms a favourable long-term survival for patients with initially sub-optimal or unresectable colorectal liver metastases who respond to conversion therapy and undergo secondary resection. Both FOLFOX/FOLFIRI plus cetuximab, appear to be appropriate regimens for 'conversion' treatment in patients with K-RAS codon 12/13/61 wild-type tumours. Thus, liver surgery can be considered curative or alternatively as an additional 'line of therapy' in those patients who are not cured.

Clinical Trial Number: NCT00153998, www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Citing Articles

Pathogenetic development, diagnosis and clinical therapeutic approaches for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer (Review).

Jin Z, Li Y, Yi H, Wang M, Wang C, Du S Int J Oncol. 2025; 66(3).

PMID: 39950314 PMC: 11844340. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2025.5728.


The role of artificial intelligence and image processing in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of liver cancer: a narrative-review.

Dimopoulos P, Mulita A, Antzoulas A, Bodard S, Leivaditis V, Akrida I Prz Gastroenterol. 2025; 19(3):221-230.

PMID: 39802971 PMC: 11718495. DOI: 10.5114/pg.2024.143147.


First-Line Therapy in Metastatic, RAS Wild-Type, Left-Sided Colorectal Cancer: Should Everyone Receive Anti-EGFR Therapy?.

Airoldi M, Bartolini M, Fazio R, Farinatti S, Dapra V, Santoro A Curr Oncol Rep. 2024; 26(11):1489-1501.

PMID: 39392559 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01601-x.


Is interval chemotherapy safe and does it improve the outcome of patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing multimodal two-stage hepatectomy? - A systematic literature review.

Raschzok N, Moosburner S, Blank M, Krenzien F, Lurje G, Schoning W BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):1260.

PMID: 39390396 PMC: 11465852. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-13008-9.


Overall survival with non-proportional hazards in first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Keshavarzi F, Salari N, Jambarsang S, Tabatabaei S, Shahsavari S, Fournier A Heliyon. 2024; 10(16):e36464.

PMID: 39253267 PMC: 11381762. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36464.