Lack of Synergistic Interaction Between the Two Mechanisms of Action of Tapentadol in Gastrointestinal Transit
Overview
Neurology
Psychiatry
Affiliations
Background: A multi-mechanistic approach offers potential enhancement of analgesic efficacy, but therapeutic gain could be offset by an increase in adverse events. The centrally acting analgesic tapentadol [(-)-(1R,2R)-3-(3-dimethylamino-1-ethyl-2-methyl-propyl)-phenol hydrochloride] combines μ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonism and neuronal noradrenaline reuptake inhibition (NRI), both of which contribute to its analgesic effects. Previously, isobolographic analysis of occupation-effect data and a theoretically equivalent methodology determining interactions from the effect scale demonstrated pronounced synergistic interaction between the two mechanisms of action of tapentadol in two models of antinociception (low-intensity tail-flick and spinal nerve ligation). The present study investigated the nature of interaction of the two mechanisms on a surrogate measure for gastrointestinal adverse effect (inhibition of gastrointestinal transit).
Methods: Dose-response curves were generated in rats for tapentadol alone or in combination with the opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone, or the α2 -adrenoceptor antagonist, yohimbine, to reveal the effect of tapentadol based upon MOR agonism, NRI, and combined mechanisms.
Results: The dose-effect curve of tapentadol was shifted to the right by both antagonists, thereby providing data to distinguish between MOR agonism and NRI. Analysis revealed a simple additive interaction between the two mechanisms on this endpoint, in contrast to the synergistic interaction previously demonstrated for antinociception.
Conclusions: We believe this is the first published evaluation of mechanistic interaction for a surrogate measure of adverse effect of a single compound with two mechanisms of action, and the results suggest that there is a greater separation between the analgesic and gastrointestinal effects of tapentadol than expected based upon its analgesic efficacy.
Foss J, Nayak S, Tallarida C, Farkas D, Ward S, Rawls S Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020; 209:107946.
PMID: 32145665 PMC: 7127966. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107946.
DAmato T, Martorelli F, Fenocchio G, Simili V, Kon E, Di Matteo B J Exp Orthop. 2019; 6(1):36.
PMID: 31359202 PMC: 6663946. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-019-0204-6.
Tapentadol: an overview of the safety profile.
Polati E, Canonico P, Schweiger V, Collino M J Pain Res. 2019; 12:1569-1576.
PMID: 31190968 PMC: 6529613. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S190154.
Tapentadol: an effective option for the treatment of back pain.
Coluzzi F, Polati E, Freo U, Grilli M J Pain Res. 2019; 12:1521-1528.
PMID: 31190963 PMC: 6526923. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S190176.
Pharmacological rationale for tapentadol therapy: a review of new evidence.
Romualdi P, Grilli M, Canonico P, Collino M, Dickenson A J Pain Res. 2019; 12:1513-1520.
PMID: 31190962 PMC: 6526917. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S190160.