» Articles » PMID: 24569635

Quantitative Trait Loci from the Host Genetic Background Modulate the Durability of a Resistance Gene: a Rational Basis for Sustainable Resistance Breeding in Plants

Overview
Specialty Genetics
Date 2014 Feb 27
PMID 24569635
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The combination of major resistance genes with quantitative resistance factors is hypothesized as a promising breeding strategy to preserve the durability of resistant cultivar, as recently observed in different pathosystems. Using the pepper (Capsicum annuum)/Potato virus Y (PVY, genus Potyvirus) pathosystem, we aimed at identifying plant genetic factors directly affecting the frequency of virus adaptation to the major resistance gene pvr2(3) and at comparing them with genetic factors affecting quantitative resistance. The resistance breakdown frequency was a highly heritable trait (h(2)=0.87). Four loci including additive quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and epistatic interactions explained together 70% of the variance of pvr2(3) breakdown frequency. Three of the four QTLs controlling pvr2(3) breakdown frequency were also involved in quantitative resistance, strongly suggesting that QTLs controlling quantitative resistance have a pleiotropic effect on the durability of the major resistance gene. With the first mapping of QTLs directly affecting resistance durability, this study provides a rationale for sustainable resistance breeding. Surprisingly, a genetic trade-off was observed between the durability of PVY resistance controlled by pvr2(3) and the spectrum of the resistance against different potyviruses. This trade-off seemed to have been resolved by the combination of minor-effect durability QTLs under long-term farmer selection.

Citing Articles

Arabidopsis eIF4E1 protects the translational machinery during TuMV infection and restricts virus accumulation.

Zafirov D, Giovinazzo N, Lecampion C, Field B, Ducassou J, Coute Y PLoS Pathog. 2023; 19(11):e1011417.

PMID: 37983287 PMC: 10721207. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011417.


Plant eIF4E isoforms as factors of susceptibility and resistance to potyviruses.

Zlobin N, Taranov V Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1041868.

PMID: 36844044 PMC: 9950400. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1041868.


Genome-wide association study for resistance to pv. in .

Ariyoshi C, Santana G, Felicio M, Sera G, Nogueira L, Rodrigues L Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:989847.

PMID: 36330243 PMC: 9624508. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.989847.


Resistance of the Wheat Cultivar 'Renan' to Septoria Leaf Blotch Explained by a Combination of Strain Specific and Strain Non-Specific QTL Mapped on an Ultra-Dense Genetic Map.

Langlands-Perry C, Cuenin M, Bergez C, Krima S, Gelisse S, Sourdille P Genes (Basel). 2022; 13(1).

PMID: 35052440 PMC: 8774678. DOI: 10.3390/genes13010100.


Concurrent evolution of resistance and tolerance to potato virus Y in Capsicum annuum revealed by genome-wide association.

Tamisier L, Szadkowski M, Girardot G, Djian-Caporalino C, Palloix A, Hirsch J Mol Plant Pathol. 2021; 23(2):254-264.

PMID: 34729890 PMC: 8743019. DOI: 10.1111/mpp.13157.


References
1.
Lee J, Nahm S, Kim Y, Kim B . Characterization and molecular genetic mapping of microsatellite loci in pepper. Theor Appl Genet. 2003; 108(4):619-27. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-003-1467-x. View

2.
Broman K, Wu H, Sen S, Churchill G . R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19(7):889-90. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg112. View

3.
Montarry J, Doumayrou J, Simon V, Moury B . Genetic background matters: a plant-virus gene-for-gene interaction is strongly influenced by genetic contexts. Mol Plant Pathol. 2011; 12(9):911-20. PMC: 6640445. DOI: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00724.x. View

4.
Poland J, Balint-Kurti P, Wisser R, Pratt R, Nelson R . Shades of gray: the world of quantitative disease resistance. Trends Plant Sci. 2008; 14(1):21-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.006. View

5.
Garcia-Arenal F, Fraile A, Malpica J . Variability and genetic structure of plant virus populations. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2001; 39:157-86. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.157. View