» Articles » PMID: 24568597

Identification of FISH Biomarkers to Detect Chromosome Abnormalities Associated with Prostate Adenocarcinoma in Tumour and Field Effect Environment

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2014 Feb 27
PMID 24568597
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To reduce sampling error associated with cancer detection in prostate needle biopsies, we explored the possibility of using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) to detect chromosomal abnormalities in the histologically benign prostate tissue from patients with adenocarcinoma of prostate.

Methods: Tumour specimens from 33 radical prostatectomy (RP) cases, histologically benign tissue from 17 of the 33 RP cases, and 26 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) control cases were evaluated with Locus Specific Identifier (LSI) probes MYC (8q24), LPL (8p21.22), and PTEN (10q23), as well as with centromere enumerator probes CEP8, CEP10, and CEP7. A distribution of FISH signals in the tumour and histologically benign adjacent tissue was compared to that in BPH specimens using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results: The combination of MYC gain, CEP8 Abnormal, PTEN loss or chromosome 7 aneusomy was positive in the tumour area of all of the 33 specimens from patients with adenocarcinomas, and in 88% of adjacent histologically benign regions (15 out of 17) but in only 15% (4 out of 26) of the benign prostatic hyperplasia control specimens.

Conclusions: A panel of FISH markers may allow detection of genomic abnormalities that associate with adenocarcinoma in the field adjacent to and surrounding the tumour, and thus could potentially indicate the presence of cancer in the specimen even if the cancer focus itself was missed by biopsy and histology review.

Citing Articles

Identification of fluorescence in situ hybridization assay markers for prediction of disease progression in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance.

Pestova K, Koch A, Quesenberry C, Shan J, Zhang Y, Leimpeter A BMC Cancer. 2018; 18(1):2.

PMID: 29291731 PMC: 5749018. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3910-4.


HER2 gene amplification in patients with prostate cancer: Evaluating a CISH-based method.

Sharifi N, Salmaninejad A, Ferdosi S, Bajestani A, Khaleghiyan M, Estiar M Oncol Lett. 2017; 12(6):4651-4658.

PMID: 28105172 PMC: 5228419. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.5235.


An examination of clinical differences between carriers and non-carriers of chromosome 8q24 risk alleles in a New Zealand Caucasian population with prostate cancer.

Bishop K, Han D, Karunasinghe N, Goudie M, Masters J, Ferguson L PeerJ. 2016; 4:e1731.

PMID: 26966665 PMC: 4782686. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1731.


Harnessing novel modalities: field carcinogenesis detection for personalizing prostate cancer management.

Momi N, Backman V, Brendler C, Roy H Future Oncol. 2015; 11(20):2737-41.

PMID: 26374598 PMC: 4868392. DOI: 10.2217/fon.15.182.


Nuclear C-MYC expression level is associated with disease progression and potentially predictive of two year overall survival in prostate cancer.

Zeng W, Sun H, Meng F, Liu Z, Xiong J, Zhou S Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015; 8(2):1878-88.

PMID: 25973080 PMC: 4396295.


References
1.
Joshua A, Shen E, Yoshimoto M, Marrano P, Zielenska M, Evans A . Topographical analysis of telomere length and correlation with genomic instability in whole mount prostatectomies. Prostate. 2010; 71(7):778-90. DOI: 10.1002/pros.21294. View

2.
Chai H, Brown R . Field effect in cancer-an update. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2009; 39(4):331-7. View

3.
Yoshimoto M, Cunha I, Coudry R, Fonseca F, Torres C, Soares F . FISH analysis of 107 prostate cancers shows that PTEN genomic deletion is associated with poor clinical outcome. Br J Cancer. 2007; 97(5):678-85. PMC: 2360375. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603924. View

4.
Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012; 62(1):10-29. DOI: 10.3322/caac.20138. View

5.
Al-Maghrabi J, Vorobyova L, Toi A, Chapman W, Zielenska M, Squire J . Identification of numerical chromosomal changes detected by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002; 126(2):165-9. DOI: 10.5858/2002-126-0165-IONCCD. View