» Articles » PMID: 24566543

Adaptive Changes in the Motor Cortex During and After Longterm Forelimb Immobilization in Adult Rats

Overview
Journal J Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 2014 Feb 26
PMID 24566543
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Experimental and clinical studies have attempted to evaluate the changes in cortical activity seen after immobilization-induced longterm sensorimotor restriction, although results remain controversial. We used intracortical microstimulation (ICMS), which provides topographic movement representations of the motor areas in both hemispheres with optimal spatial characterization, combined with behavioural testing to unravel the effects of limb immobilization on movement representations in the rat primary motor cortex (M1). Unilateral forelimb immobilization in rats was achieved by casting the entire limb and leaving the cast in place for 15 or 30 days. Changes in M1 were bilateral and specific for the forelimb area, but were stronger in the contralateral-to-cast hemisphere. The threshold current required to evoke forelimb movement increased progressively over the period in cast, whereas the forelimb area size decreased and the non-excitable area size increased. Casting resulted in a redistribution of proximal/distal movement representations: proximal forelimb representation increased, whereas distal representation decreased in size. ICMS after cast removal showed a reversal of changes, which remained partial at 15 days. Local application of the GABAA-antagonist bicuculline revealed the impairment of cortical synaptic connectivity in the forelimb area during the period of cast and for up to 15 days after cast removal. Six days of rehabilitation using a rotarod performance protocol after cast removal did not advance map size normalization in the contralateral-to-cast M1 and enabled the cortical output towards the distal forelimb only in sites that had maintained their excitability. These results are relevant to our understanding of adult M1 plasticity during and after sensorimotor deprivation, and to new approaches to conditions that require longterm limb immobilization.

Citing Articles

Dysregulation of dopamine neurotransmission in the nucleus accumbens in immobilization-induced hypersensitivity.

Kishikawa Y, Kawahara Y, Ohnishi Y, Sotogaku N, Koeda T, Kawahara H Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:988178.

PMID: 36160381 PMC: 9493457. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.988178.


Putting the "Sensory" Into Sensorimotor Control: The Role of Sensorimotor Integration in Goal-Directed Hand Movements After Stroke.

Edwards L, King E, Buetefisch C, Borich M Front Integr Neurosci. 2019; 13:16.

PMID: 31191265 PMC: 6539545. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2019.00016.


HCN channels segregate stimulation-evoked movement responses in neocortex and allow for coordinated forelimb movements in rodents.

Boychuk J, Farrell J, Palmer L, Singleton A, Pittman Q, Teskey G J Physiol. 2016; 595(1):247-263.

PMID: 27568501 PMC: 5199725. DOI: 10.1113/JP273068.


Post-Stroke Longitudinal Alterations of Inter-Hemispheric Correlation and Hemispheric Dominance in Mouse Pre-Motor Cortex.

Vallone F, Lai S, Spalletti C, Panarese A, Alia C, Micera S PLoS One. 2016; 11(1):e0146858.

PMID: 26752066 PMC: 4709093. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146858.


Sensorimotor restriction affects complex movement topography and reachable space in the rat motor cortex.

Budri M, Lodi E, Franchi G Front Syst Neurosci. 2015; 8:231.

PMID: 25565987 PMC: 4264501. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00231.

References
1.
Neafsey E, Bold E, Haas G, Quirk G, Sievert C, Terreberry R . The organization of the rat motor cortex: a microstimulation mapping study. Brain Res. 1986; 396(1):77-96. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(86)80191-3. View

2.
Viaro R, Morari M, Franchi G . Progressive motor cortex functional reorganization following 6-hydroxydopamine lesioning in rats. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(12):4544-54. PMC: 6622898. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5394-10.2011. View

3.
Leingartner A, Thuret S, Kroll T, Chou S, Leasure J, Gage F . Cortical area size dictates performance at modality-specific behaviors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(10):4153-8. PMC: 1820724. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0611723104. View

4.
Young N, Vuong J, Flynn C, Teskey G . Optimal parameters for microstimulation derived forelimb movement thresholds and motor maps in rats and mice. J Neurosci Methods. 2011; 196(1):60-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.12.028. View

5.
Jones T, Schallert T . Use-dependent growth of pyramidal neurons after neocortical damage. J Neurosci. 1994; 14(4):2140-52. PMC: 6577139. View