» Articles » PMID: 24562857

Nanomechanics of β-rich Proteins Related to Neuronal Disorders Studied by AFM, All-atom and Coarse-grained MD Methods

Overview
Journal J Mol Model
Publisher Springer
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 2014 Feb 25
PMID 24562857
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Computer simulations of protein unfolding substantially help to interpret force-extension curves measured in single-molecule atomic force microscope (AFM) experiments. Standard all-atom (AA) molecular dynamics simulations (MD) give a good qualitative mechanical unfolding picture but predict values too large for the maximum AFM forces with the common pulling speeds adopted here. Fine tuned coarse-grain MD computations (CG MD) offer quantitative agreement with experimental forces. In this paper we address an important methodological aspect of MD modeling, namely the impact of numerical noise generated by random assignments of bead velocities on maximum forces (F(max)) calculated within the CG MD approach. Distributions of CG forces from 2000 MD runs for several model proteins rich in β structures and having folds with increasing complexity are presented. It is shown that F(max) have nearly Gaussian distributions and that values of F(max) for each of those β-structures may vary from 93.2 ± 28.9 pN (neurexin) to 198.3 ± 25.2 pN (fibronectin). The CG unfolding spectra are compared with AA steered MD data and with results of our AFM experiments for modules present in contactin, fibronectin and neurexin. The stability of these proteins is critical for the proper functioning of neuronal synaptic clefts. Our results confirm that CG modeling of a single molecule unfolding is a good auxiliary tool in nanomechanics but large sets of data have to be collected before reliable comparisons of protein mechanical stabilities are made.

Citing Articles

Mathematical model of mechanobiology of acute and repeated synaptic injury and systemic biomarker kinetics.

Gharahi H, Garimella H, Chen Z, Gupta R, Przekwas A Front Cell Neurosci. 2023; 17:1007062.

PMID: 36814869 PMC: 9939777. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1007062.


Entropic bonding of the type 1 pilus from experiment and simulation.

Corsetti F, Alonso-Caballero A, Poly S, Perez-Jimenez R, Artacho E R Soc Open Sci. 2020; 7(4):200183.

PMID: 32431906 PMC: 7211842. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.200183.


Dynamics, nanomechanics and signal transduction in reelin repeats.

Mikulska-Ruminska K, Strzelecki J, Nowak W Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):18974.

PMID: 31831824 PMC: 6908669. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55461-8.


Nanomechanics of multidomain neuronal cell adhesion protein contactin revealed by single molecule AFM and SMD.

Mikulska-Ruminska K, Kulik A, Benadiba C, Bahar I, Dietler G, Nowak W Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):8852.

PMID: 28821864 PMC: 5562865. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-09482-w.

References
1.
Marszalek P, Lu H, Li H, Carrion-Vazquez M, Oberhauser A, Schulten K . Mechanical unfolding intermediates in titin modules. Nature. 1999; 402(6757):100-3. DOI: 10.1038/47083. View

2.
Holt R, Monaco A . Links between genetics and pathophysiology in the autism spectrum disorders. EMBO Mol Med. 2011; 3(8):438-50. PMC: 3377085. DOI: 10.1002/emmm.201100157. View

3.
Zuko A, Kleijer K, Oguro-Ando A, Kas M, van Daalen E, Van der Zwaag B . Contactins in the neurobiology of autism. Eur J Pharmacol. 2013; 719(1-3):63-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.07.016. View

4.
Isralewitz B, Baudry J, Gullingsrud J, Kosztin D, Schulten K . Steered molecular dynamics investigations of protein function. J Mol Graph Model. 2001; 19(1):13-25. DOI: 10.1016/s1093-3263(00)00133-9. View

5.
West D, Brockwell D, Olmsted P, Radford S, Paci E . Mechanical resistance of proteins explained using simple molecular models. Biophys J. 2005; 90(1):287-97. PMC: 1367027. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.071035. View