» Articles » PMID: 24562077

CTER-rapid Estimation of CTF Parameters with Error Assessment

Overview
Journal Ultramicroscopy
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Radiology
Date 2014 Feb 25
PMID 24562077
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In structural electron microscopy, the accurate estimation of the Contrast Transfer Function (CTF) parameters, particularly defocus and astigmatism, is of utmost importance for both initial evaluation of micrograph quality and for subsequent structure determination. Due to increases in the rate of data collection on modern microscopes equipped with new generation cameras, it is also important that the CTF estimation can be done rapidly and with minimal user intervention. Finally, in order to minimize the necessity for manual screening of the micrographs by a user it is necessary to provide an assessment of the errors of fitted parameters values. In this work we introduce CTER, a CTF parameters estimation method distinguished by its computational efficiency. The efficiency of the method makes it suitable for high-throughput EM data collection, and enables the use of a statistical resampling technique, bootstrap, that yields standard deviations of estimated defocus and astigmatism amplitude and angle, thus facilitating the automation of the process of screening out inferior micrograph data. Furthermore, CTER also outputs the spatial frequency limit imposed by reciprocal space aliasing of the discrete form of the CTF and the finite window size. We demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of CTER using a data set collected on a 300kV Tecnai Polara (FEI) using the K2 Summit DED camera in super-resolution counting mode. Using CTER we obtained a structure of the 80S ribosome whose large subunit had a resolution of 4.03Å without, and 3.85Å with, inclusion of astigmatism parameters.

Citing Articles

Accurate, automatic determination of astigmatism and phase with Ctfplotter in IMOD.

Mastronarde D J Struct Biol. 2024; 216(1):108057.

PMID: 38182035 PMC: 10939802. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2023.108057.


Structural and biochemical investigations of a HEAT-repeat protein involved in the cytosolic iron-sulfur cluster assembly pathway.

Vasquez S, Marquez M, Brignole E, Vo A, Kong S, Park C Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):1276.

PMID: 38110506 PMC: 10728100. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05579-3.


Computational methods for structural studies with cryogenic electron tomography.

Zhao C, Lu D, Zhao Q, Ren C, Zhang H, Zhai J Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023; 13:1135013.

PMID: 37868346 PMC: 10586593. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1135013.


Novel Artificial Intelligence-Based Approaches for Ab Initio Structure Determination and Atomic Model Building for Cryo-Electron Microscopy.

DiIorio M, Kulczyk A Micromachines (Basel). 2023; 14(9).

PMID: 37763837 PMC: 10534518. DOI: 10.3390/mi14091674.


CryoEM single particle reconstruction with a complex-valued particle stack.

Bromberg R, Guo Y, Borek D, Otwinowski Z J Struct Biol. 2023; 215(2):107945.

PMID: 36889560 PMC: 10200766. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2023.107945.


References
1.
Sorzano C, Otero A, Olmos E, Carazo J . Error analysis in the determination of the electron microscopical contrast transfer function parameters from experimental power Spectra. BMC Struct Biol. 2009; 9:18. PMC: 2683171. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6807-9-18. View

2.
Lander G, Stagg S, Voss N, Cheng A, Fellmann D, Pulokas J . Appion: an integrated, database-driven pipeline to facilitate EM image processing. J Struct Biol. 2009; 166(1):95-102. PMC: 2775544. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2009.01.002. View

3.
Penczek P . Image restoration in cryo-electron microscopy. Methods Enzymol. 2010; 482:35-72. PMC: 3166661. DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(10)82002-6. View

4.
Milazzo A, Moldovan G, Lanman J, Jin L, Bouwer J, Klienfelder S . Characterization of a direct detection device imaging camera for transmission electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy. 2010; 110(7):744-7. PMC: 2923635. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.03.007. View

5.
Stagg S, Lander G, Pulokas J, Fellmann D, Cheng A, Quispe J . Automated cryoEM data acquisition and analysis of 284742 particles of GroEL. J Struct Biol. 2006; 155(3):470-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2006.04.005. View