» Articles » PMID: 24561228

Space, Time, and Causality in the Human Brain

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2014 Feb 25
PMID 24561228
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability to perceive causality is a central human ability constructed from elemental spatial and temporal information present in the environment. Although the nature of causality has captivated philosophers and scientists since antiquity, the neural correlates of causality remain poorly understood. In the present study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to generate hypotheses for candidate brain regions related to component processes important for perceptual causality in the human brain: elemental space perception, elemental time perception, and decision-making (Experiment 1; n=16). We then used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to test neural hypotheses generated from the fMRI experiment (Experiment 2; n=16). In both experiments, participants judged causality in billiard-ball style launching events; a blue ball approaches and contacts a red ball. Spatial and temporal contributions to causal perception were assessed by parametrically varying the spatial linearity and the temporal delays of the movement of the balls. Experiment 1 demonstrated unique patterns of activation correlated with spatial, temporal, and decision-making components of causality perception. Using tDCS, we then tested hypotheses for the specific roles of the parietal and frontal cortices found in the fMRI experiment. Parietal stimulation only decreased participants' perception of causality based on spatial violations, while frontal stimulation made participants less likely to perceive causality based on violations of space and time. Converging results from fMRI and tDCS indicate that parietal cortices contribute to causal perception because of their specific role in processing spatial relations, while the frontal cortices contribute more generally, consistent with their role in decision-making.

Citing Articles

Improving causality perception judgments in schizophrenia spectrum disorder via transcranial direct current stimulation.

Schulke R, Schmitter C, Straube B J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2023; 48(4):E245-E254.

PMID: 37402578 PMC: 10322162. DOI: 10.1503/jpn.220184.


Embodying Time in the Brain: A Multi-Dimensional Neuroimaging Meta-Analysis of 95 Duration Processing Studies.

Naghibi N, Jahangiri N, Khosrowabadi R, Eickhoff C, Eickhoff S, Coull J Neuropsychol Rev. 2023; 34(1):277-298.

PMID: 36857010 PMC: 10920454. DOI: 10.1007/s11065-023-09588-1.


Effects of Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Retention of Performance Gains on an Obstacle Negotiation Task in Older Adults.

Chatterjee S, Seidler R, Skinner J, Lysne P, Sumonthee C, Wu S Neuromodulation. 2022; 26(4):829-839.

PMID: 35410769 PMC: 9547038. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.02.231.


A checklist for assessing the methodological quality of concurrent tES-fMRI studies (ContES checklist): a consensus study and statement.

Ekhtiari H, Ghobadi-Azbari P, Thielscher A, Antal A, Li L, Shereen A Nat Protoc. 2022; 17(3):596-617.

PMID: 35121855 PMC: 7612687. DOI: 10.1038/s41596-021-00664-5.


Giving Up on Consciousness as the Ghost in the Machine.

Halligan P, Oakley D Front Psychol. 2021; 12:571460.

PMID: 33995166 PMC: 8121175. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.571460.


References
1.
Nelson J, McKinley R, Golob E, Warm J, Parasuraman R . Enhancing vigilance in operators with prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Neuroimage. 2012; 85 Pt 3:909-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.061. View

2.
Laufs H, Krakow K, Sterzer P, Eger E, Beyerle A, Salek-Haddadi A . Electroencephalographic signatures of attentional and cognitive default modes in spontaneous brain activity fluctuations at rest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(19):11053-8. PMC: 196925. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1831638100. View

3.
Chang L, Yarkoni T, Khaw M, Sanfey A . Decoding the role of the insula in human cognition: functional parcellation and large-scale reverse inference. Cereb Cortex. 2012; 23(3):739-49. PMC: 3563343. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs065. View

4.
Zhang J, Feng C, Fox P, Gao J, Tan L . Is left inferior frontal gyrus a general mechanism for selection?. Neuroimage. 2004; 23(2):596-603. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.006. View

5.
Hecht D, Walsh V, Lavidor M . Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates decision making in a probabilistic guessing task. J Neurosci. 2010; 30(12):4241-5. PMC: 6634503. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2924-09.2010. View