» Articles » PMID: 24550476

Small Distances Can Keep Bacteria at Bay for Days

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2014 Feb 20
PMID 24550476
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transmission of pathogens between spatially separated hosts, i.e., indirect transmission, is a commonly encountered phenomenon important for epidemic pathogen spread. The routes of indirect transmission often remain untraced, making it difficult to develop control strategies. Here we used a tailor-made design to study indirect transmission experimentally, using two different zoonotic bacteria in broilers. Previous experiments using a single bacterial species yielded a delay in the onset of transmission, which we hypothesized to result from the interplay between diffusive motion of infectious material and decay of infectivity in the environment. Indeed, a mathematical model of diffusive pathogen transfer predicts a delay in transmission that depends both on the distance between hosts and on the magnitude of the pathogen decay rate. Our experiments, carried out with two bacterial species with very different decay rates in the environment, confirm the difference in transmission delay predicted by the model. These results imply that for control of an infectious agent, the time between the distant exposure and the infection event is important. To illustrate how this can work we analyzed data observed on the spread of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in an intensive care unit. Indeed, a delayed vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus transmission component was identified in these data, and this component disappeared in a study period in which the environment was thoroughly cleaned. Therefore, we suggest that the impact of control strategies against indirect transmission can be assessed using our model by estimating the control measures' effects on the diffusion coefficient and the pathogen decay rate.

Citing Articles

Combining a parsimonious mathematical model with infection data from tailor-made experiments to understand environmental transmission.

Gamza A, Hagenaars T, Koene M, de Jong M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):12986.

PMID: 37563156 PMC: 10415373. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-38817-z.


The Role of the Environment in Dynamics of Antibiotic Resistance in Humans and Animals: A Modelling Study.

Lepper H, Woolhouse M, van Bunnik B Antibiotics (Basel). 2022; 11(10).

PMID: 36290019 PMC: 9598675. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11101361.


Probabilistic modelling of effects of antibiotics and calendar time on transmission of healthcare-associated infection.

Laager M, Cooper B, Eyre D Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):21417.

PMID: 34725404 PMC: 8560804. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00748-y.


Non-respiratory particles emitted by guinea pigs in airborne disease transmission experiments.

Asadi S, Tupas M, Barre R, Wexler A, Bouvier N, Ristenpart W Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):17490.

PMID: 34471147 PMC: 8410799. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96678-w.


Take care of the environment: housing conditions affect the interplay of nutritional interventions and intestinal microbiota in broiler chickens.

Kers J, Velkers F, Fischer E, Hermes G, Lamot D, Stegeman J Anim Microbiome. 2021; 1(1):10.

PMID: 33499936 PMC: 7807522. DOI: 10.1186/s42523-019-0009-z.


References
1.
Rohani P, Breban R, Stallknecht D, Drake J . Environmental transmission of low pathogenicity avian influenza viruses and its implications for pathogen invasion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(25):10365-9. PMC: 2690603. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0809026106. View

2.
Ferguson N, Donnelly C, Anderson R . The foot-and-mouth epidemic in Great Britain: pattern of spread and impact of interventions. Science. 2001; 292(5519):1155-60. DOI: 10.1126/science.1061020. View

3.
Dekker N, Bouma A, Daemen I, Klinkenberg D, van Leengoed L, Wagenaar J . Effect of spatial separation of pigs on spread of Streptococcus suis serotype 9. PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e61339. PMC: 3622602. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061339. View

4.
Hayden M, Bonten M, Blom D, Lyle E, van de Vijver D, Weinstein R . Reduction in acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus after enforcement of routine environmental cleaning measures. Clin Infect Dis. 2006; 42(11):1552-60. DOI: 10.1086/503845. View

5.
Boender G, Hagenaars T, Bouma A, Nodelijk G, Elbers A, de Jong M . Risk maps for the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007; 3(4):e71. PMC: 1853123. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030071. View