» Articles » PMID: 24550439

Late Adverse Events After Implantation of Sirolimus-eluting Stent and Bare-metal Stent: Long-term (5-7 Years) Follow-up of the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study-Kyoto Registry Cohort-2

Abstract

Background: Late adverse events such as very late stent thrombosis (VLST) or late target-lesion revascularization (TLR) after first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) implantation have not been yet fully characterized at long term in comparison with those after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation.

Methods And Results: Among 13 058 consecutive patients undergoing first percutaneous coronary intervention in the Coronary REvascularization Demonstrating Outcome study-Kyoto registry Cohort-2, 5078 patients were treated with SES only, and 5392 patients were treated with BMS only. During 7-year follow-up, VLST and late TLR beyond 1 year after SES implantation occurred constantly and without attenuation at 0.24% per year and at 2.0% per year, respectively. Cumulative 7-year incidence of VLST was significantly higher in the SES group than that in the BMS group (1.43% versus 0.68%, P<0.0001). However, there was no excess of all-cause death beyond 1 year in the SES group as compared with that in the BMS group (20.8% versus 19.6%, P=0.91). Cumulative incidences of late TLR (both overall and clinically driven) were also significantly higher in the SES group than in the BMS group (12.0% versus 4.1%, P<0.0001 and 8.5% versus 2.6%, P<0.0001, respectively), leading to late catch-up of the SES group to the BMS group regarding TLR through the entire 7-year follow-up (18.8% versus 25.2%, and 10.6% versus 10.2%, respectively). Clinical presentation as acute coronary syndrome was more common at the time of late SES TLR compared with early SES TLR (21.2% and 10.0%).

Conclusions: Late catch-up phenomenon regarding stent thrombosis and TLR was significantly more pronounced with SES than that with BMS. This limitation should remain the target for improvements of DES technology.

Citing Articles

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing BioMime Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With Everolimus-Eluting Stent: Two-Year Outcomes of the meriT-V Trial.

Abizaid A, Costa R, Kedev S, Kedhi E, Talwar S, Erglis A Cardiol Res. 2023; 14(4):291-301.

PMID: 37559713 PMC: 10409544. DOI: 10.14740/cr1498.


Biodegradable or durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: ten-year outcomes of the randomised NEXT Trial.

Natsuaki M, Watanabe H, Morimoto T, Kozuma K, Kadota K, Muramatsu T EuroIntervention. 2023; 19(5):e402-e413.

PMID: 37395475 PMC: 10397680. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00076.


Five-year outcomes of biodegradable versus second-generation durable polymer drug-eluting stents used in complex percutaneous coronary intervention.

Xu N, Jiang L, Yao Y, Xu J, Liu R, Wang H Chin Med J (Engl). 2023; 136(3):322-330.

PMID: 36848178 PMC: 10106121. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002450.


Neoatherosclerosis prediction using plaque markers in intravascular optical coherence tomography images.

Lee J, Pereira G, Motairek I, Kim J, Zimin V, Dallan L Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 9:1079046.

PMID: 36588557 PMC: 9794759. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1079046.


Stent-Related Adverse Events as Related to Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in First- vs Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents.

Yoshikawa Y, Shiomi H, Morimoto T, Takeji Y, Matsumura-Nakano Y, Yamamoto K JACC Asia. 2022; 1(3):345-356.

PMID: 36341224 PMC: 9627913. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.08.010.