» Articles » PMID: 24531407

How Often Should Shelf/Gellhorn Pessaries Be Changed? A Survey of IUGA Urogynaecologists

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2014 Feb 18
PMID 24531407
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction And Hypothesis: Gellhorn and shelf pessaries can be effective management for women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This study aimed to investigate the opinion of IUGA members about shelf/Gellhorn pessary use, and in particular, how often to change them in patients with POP. There are no evidence-based guidelines available on this subject.

Methods: Members of the International Urogynaecology Association (IUGA) and the British Society of Urogynaecology (BSUG) were sent a single electronic mailing of semi-structured questionnaires containing closed and open questions and free text response boxes. The internet-based survey consisted of 13 questions. Free text responses were analysed using a thematic qualitative analysis.

Results: A total of 322 respondents from the IUGA membership participated in the survey. Most consider shelf/Gellhorn pessaries an effective first-line treatment for their patients with POP. Self care is usually acceptable with ring pessaries, but with shelf/Gellhorn, 35 % would like to change them every 3 months, 31 % every 6 months and the rest varied. The routine use of oestrogens along with shelf/Gellhorn pessaries is a common practice. The risk of urogenital fistulae is well documented, but overall clinicians felt that shelf/Gellhorn pessaries are a safe and effective treatment for POP.

Conclusions: This study highlights the wide variation in global practice of the management of shelf/Gellhorn pessaries for POP. In order to inform our practice, evidence-based guidelines are required. A randomised control trial may help to decide whether or not it is appropriate to change the shelf/Gellhorn pessaries at all.

Citing Articles

International Urogynecology Consultation Chapter 3 Committee 1 - Pessary Management.

Rantell A, Abdool Z, Fullerton M, Gedefaw A, Lough K, Miotla P Int Urogynecol J. 2025; .

PMID: 39873780 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-06020-x.


Understanding Factors That Affect Willingness to Self-Manage a Pessary for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Questionnaire-Based Cross-Sectional Study of Pessary-Using Women in the UK.

Dwyer L, Rajai A, Dowding D, Kearney R Int Urogynecol J. 2024; 35(8):1627-1634.

PMID: 38953998 PMC: 11380633. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05840-1.


Theoretical and practical development of the TOPSY self-management intervention for women who use a vaginal pessary for pelvic organ prolapse.

Dwyer L, Bugge C, Hagen S, Goodman K, Agur W, Dembinsky M Trials. 2022; 23(1):742.

PMID: 36064727 PMC: 9446823. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06681-3.


What is known from the existing literature about self-management of pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse? A scoping review.

Dwyer L, Dowding D, Kearney R BMJ Open. 2022; 12(7):e060223.

PMID: 35851026 PMC: 9297214. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060223.


Adapting to Challenging Circumstances: Pessary Care in a Racially Diverse Urban Population Within a U.S. Epicenter of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Kadam Halani P, Gelman E, Duchein Y, Roselli N, Leegant A Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021; 28(2):121-125.

PMID: 34171881 PMC: 8808767. DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001085.


References
1.
Arias B, Ridgeway B, Barber M . Complications of neglected vaginal pessaries: case presentation and literature review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008; 19(8):1173-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-008-0574-2. View

2.
Oliver R, Thakar R, Sultan A . The history and usage of the vaginal pessary: a review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011; 156(2):125-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.12.039. View

3.
Gorti M, Hudelist G, Simons A . Evaluation of vaginal pessary management: a UK-based survey. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 29(2):129-31. DOI: 10.1080/01443610902719813. View

4.
Abdool Z, Thakar R, Sultan A, Oliver R . Prospective evaluation of outcome of vaginal pessaries versus surgery in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010; 22(3):273-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-010-1340-9. View

5.
Summers J, Ford M . The forgotten pessary: a medical oddity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971; 111(2):307-8. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(71)90911-2. View