Adolescent Self-defined Neighborhoods and Activity Spaces: Spatial Overlap and Relations to Physical Activity and Obesity

Overview

Journal Health Place

Publisher Elsevier

Specialty Public Health

Date 2014 Feb 15

PMID 24524894

Citations 21

Authors

Natalie Colabianchi

Claudia J Coulton

James D Hibbert

Stephanie M McClure

Carolyn E Ievers-Landis

Esa M Davis

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Defining the proper geographic scale for built environment exposures continues to present challenges. In this study, size attributes and exposure calculations from two commonly used neighborhood boundaries were compared to those from neighborhoods that were self-defined by a sample of 145 urban minority adolescents living in subsidized housing estates. Associations between five built environment exposures and physical activity, overweight and obesity were also examined across the three neighborhood definitions. Limited spatial overlap was observed across the various neighborhood definitions. Further, many places where adolescents were active were not within the participants׳ neighborhoods. No statistically significant associations were found between counts of facilities and the outcomes based on exposure calculations using the self-defined boundaries; however, a few associations were evident for exposures using the 0.75mile network buffer and census tract boundaries. Future investigation of the relationship between the built environment, physical activity and obesity will require practical and theoretically-based methods for capturing salient environmental exposures.

Citing Articles

Geographic Isolation, Compelled Mobility, and Everyday Exposure to Neighborhood Racial Composition Among Urban Youth.

Browning C, Tarrence J, Calder C, Pinchak N, Boettner B AJS. 2024; 128(3):914-961.

PMID: 38213504 PMC: 10783811. DOI: 10.1086/721666.

Investigating where adolescents engage in moderate to vigorous physical activity and sedentary behaviour: An exploratory study.

Christensen A, Griffiths C, Hobbs M, Gorse C, Radley D PLoS One. 2022; 17(12):e0276934.

PMID: 36472978 PMC: 9725162. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276934.

Associations between neighborhood characteristics and dating violence: does spatial scale matter?.

Rodrigues P, Hebert M, Philibert M Int J Health Geogr. 2022; 21(1):6.

PMID: 35725471 PMC: 9210619. DOI: 10.1186/s12942-022-00306-3.

The Potential for Bias across GPS-Accelerometer Combined Wear Criteria among Adolescents.

Kepper M, Staiano A, Broyles S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(10).

PMID: 35627467 PMC: 9141158. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19105931.

Built environment and physical activity among adolescents: the moderating effects of neighborhood safety and social support.

Loh V, Veitch J, Salmon J, Cerin E, Thornton L, Mavoa S Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019; 16(1):132.

PMID: 31852521 PMC: 6921481. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-019-0898-y.

References

Rainham D, McDowell I, Krewski D, Sawada M . Conceptualizing the healthscape: contributions of time geography, location technologies and spatial ecology to place and health research. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 70(5):668-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.035. View

Rainham D, Bates C, Blanchard C, Dummer T, Kirk S, Shearer C . Spatial classification of youth physical activity patterns. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42(5):e87-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.011. View

Kuczmarski R, Ogden C, Guo S, Grummer-Strawn L, Flegal K, Mei Z . 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat 11. 2002; (246):1-190. View

Feng J, Glass T, Curriero F, Stewart W, Schwartz B . The built environment and obesity: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence. Health Place. 2009; 16(2):175-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.09.008. View

Wheeler B, Cooper A, Page A, Jago R . Greenspace and children's physical activity: a GPS/GIS analysis of the PEACH project. Prev Med. 2010; 51(2):148-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.001. View

Prochaska J, Sallis J, Long B . A physical activity screening measure for use with adolescents in primary care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001; 155(5):554-9. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.155.5.554. View

Boone-Heinonen J, Popkin B, Song Y, Gordon-Larsen P . What neighborhood area captures built environment features related to adolescent physical activity?. Health Place. 2010; 16(6):1280-6. PMC: 3005308. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.06.015. View

Giles-Corti B, Kelty S, Zubrick S, Villanueva K . Encouraging walking for transport and physical activity in children and adolescents: how important is the built environment?. Sports Med. 2009; 39(12):995-1009. DOI: 10.2165/11319620-000000000-00000. View

Rahman T, Cushing R, Jackson R . Contributions of built environment to childhood obesity. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011; 78(1):49-57. DOI: 10.1002/msj.20235. View

10.

Rodriguez D, Cho G, Evenson K, Conway T, Cohen D, Ghosh-Dastidar B . Out and about: association of the built environment with physical activity behaviors of adolescent females. Health Place. 2011; 18(1):55-62. PMC: 3259163. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.020. View

11.

Davison K, Lawson C . Do attributes in the physical environment influence children's physical activity? A review of the literature. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006; 3:19. PMC: 1557665. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-3-19. View

12.

Macintyre S, Ellaway A, Cummins S . Place effects on health: how can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure them?. Soc Sci Med. 2002; 55(1):125-39. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00214-3. View

13.

Ding D, Gebel K . Built environment, physical activity, and obesity: what have we learned from reviewing the literature?. Health Place. 2011; 18(1):100-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.021. View

14.

Colabianchi N, Dowda M, Pfeiffer K, Porter D, Almeida M, Pate R . Towards an understanding of salient neighborhood boundaries: adolescent reports of an easy walking distance and convenient driving distance. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007; 4:66. PMC: 2225417. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-4-66. View

15.

Zenk S, Schulz A, Matthews S, Odoms-Young A, Wilbur J, Wegrzyn L . Activity space environment and dietary and physical activity behaviors: a pilot study. Health Place. 2011; 17(5):1150-61. PMC: 3224849. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.05.001. View

16.

Coulton C, Jennings M, Chan T . How big is my neighborhood? Individual and contextual effects on perceptions of neighborhood scale. Am J Community Psychol. 2012; 51(1-2):140-50. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-012-9550-6. View

17.

Leal C, Chaix B . The influence of geographic life environments on cardiometabolic risk factors: a systematic review, a methodological assessment and a research agenda. Obes Rev. 2010; 12(3):217-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00726.x. View

18.

Prins R, Ball K, Timperio A, Salmon J, Oenema A, Brug J . Associations between availability of facilities within three different neighbourhood buffer sizes and objectively assessed physical activity in adolescents. Health Place. 2011; 17(6):1228-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.07.012. View

19.

Troped P, Wilson J, Matthews C, Cromley E, Melly S . The built environment and location-based physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 38(4):429-38. PMC: 3568665. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.032. View

20.

Wiehe S, Carroll A, Liu G, Haberkorn K, Hoch S, Wilson J . Using GPS-enabled cell phones to track the travel patterns of adolescents. Int J Health Geogr. 2008; 7:22. PMC: 2426678. DOI: 10.1186/1476-072X-7-22. View