» Articles » PMID: 24524281

Estimating the Budget Impact of Orphan Drugs in Sweden and France 2013-2020

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2014 Feb 15
PMID 24524281
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The growth in expenditure on orphan medicinal products (OMP) across Europe has been identified as a concern. Estimates of future expenditure in Europe have suggested that OMPs could account for a significant proportion of total pharmaceutical expenditure in some countries, but few of these forecasts have been well validated. This analysis aims to establish a robust forecast of the future budget impact of OMPs on the healthcare systems in Sweden and France.

Methods: A dynamic forecasting model was created to estimate the budget impact of OMPs in Sweden and France between 2013 and 2020. The model used historical data on OMP designation and approval rates to predict the number of new OMPs coming to the market. Average OMP sales were estimated for each year post-launch by regression analysis of historical sales data. Total forecast sales were compared with expected sales of all pharmaceuticals in each country to quantify the relative budget impact.

Results: The model predicts that by 2020, 152 OMPs will have marketing authorization in Europe. The base case OMP budget impacts are forecast to grow from 2.7% in Sweden and 3.2% in France of total drug expenditure in 2013 to 4.1% in Sweden and 4.9% in France by 2020. The principal driver of expenditure growth is the number of new OMPs obtaining OMP designation. This is tempered by the slowing success rate for new approvals and the loss of intellectual property protection on existing orphan medicines. Given the forward-looking nature of the analysis, uncertainty exists around model parameters and sensitivity analysis found peak year budget impact varying between 2% and 11%.

Conclusion: The budget impact of OMPs in Sweden and France is likely to remain sustainable over time and a relatively small proportion of total pharmaceutical expenditure. This forecast could be affected by changes in the success rate for OMP approvals, average cost of OMPs, and the type of companies developing OMPs.

Citing Articles

Budget impact analysis of high-priced orphan medicinal products intended for the treatment of rare diseases in China: evidence from a densely populated metropolis of Chengdu.

Zhang X, Zhou T, Zhou J, Zhang D, Yang Y, Pan J BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1123.

PMID: 39334210 PMC: 11430509. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11632-6.


Costs of orphan medicinal products: longitudinal analysis of expenditure in Wales.

Pijeira Perez Y, Wood E, Hughes D Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023; 18(1):342.

PMID: 37915031 PMC: 10621215. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-023-02956-3.


Methodological Quality Assessment of Budget Impact Analyses for Orphan Drugs: A Systematic Review.

Abdallah K, Huys I, Claes K, Simoens S Front Pharmacol. 2021; 12:630949.

PMID: 33967766 PMC: 8098807. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.630949.


Public spending on orphan medicines: a review of the literature.

Gombocz M, Vogler S J Pharm Policy Pract. 2020; 13:66.

PMID: 33062285 PMC: 7552556. DOI: 10.1186/s40545-020-00260-0.


Patient Accessibility and Budget Impact of Orphan Drugs in South Korea: Long-Term and Real-World Data Analysis (2007-2019).

Lee S, Yoo S, Bang J, Lee J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(9).

PMID: 32357397 PMC: 7246809. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17092991.


References
1.
Schey C, Milanova T, Hutchings A . Estimating the budget impact of orphan medicines in Europe: 2010 - 2020. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011; 6:62. PMC: 3191371. DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-62. View

2.
Sharma A, Jacob A, Tandon M, Kumar D . Orphan drug: Development trends and strategies. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2010; 2(4):290-9. PMC: 2996062. DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.72128. View

3.
Roos J, Hyry H, Cox T . Orphan drug pricing may warrant a competition law investigation. BMJ. 2010; 341:c6471. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c6471. View

4.
Orofino J, Soto J, Casado M, Oyaguez I . Global spending on orphan drugs in France, Germany, the UK, Italy and Spain during 2007. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010; 8(5):301-15. DOI: 10.2165/11531880-000000000-00000. View

5.
Denis A, Mergaert L, Fostier C, Cleemput I, Simoens S . A comparative study of European rare disease and orphan drug markets. Health Policy. 2010; 97(2-3):173-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.017. View