» Articles » PMID: 24520459

The Effects of Cell Phone Waves (900 MHz-GSM Band) on Sperm Parameters and Total Antioxidant Capacity in Rats

Overview
Date 2014 Feb 13
PMID 24520459
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is tremendous concern regarding the possible adverse effects of cell phone microwaves. Contradictory results, however, have been reported for the effects of these waves on the body. In the present study, the effect of cell phone microwaves on sperm parameters and total antioxidant capacity was investigated with regard to the duration of exposure and the frequency of these waves.

Materials And Methods: This experimental study was performed on 28 adult male Wistar rats (200-250 g). The animals were randomly assigned to four groups (n=7): i. control; ii. two-week exposure to cell phone-simulated waves; iii. three-week exposure to cell phonesimulated waves; and iv. two-week exposure to cell phone antenna waves. In all groups, sperm analysis was performed based on standard methods and we determined the mean sperm total antioxidant capacity according to the ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) method. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test using SPSS version 16 software.

Results: The results indicated that sperm viability, motility, and total antioxidant capacity in all exposure groups decreased significantly compared to the control group (p<0.05). Increasing the duration of exposure from 2 to 3 weeks caused a statistically significant decrease in sperm viability and motility (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Exposure to cell phone waves can decrease sperm viability and motility in rats. These waves can also decrease sperm total antioxidant capacity in rats and result in oxidative stress.

Citing Articles

Histopathologic effects of mobile phone radiation exposure on the testes and sperm parameters: a systematic literature review of animal studies.

Assefa E, Abdu S Front Reprod Health. 2025; 6:1515166.

PMID: 39896841 PMC: 11782230. DOI: 10.3389/frph.2024.1515166.


The Distribution of Boars Spermatozoa in Morphometrically Distinct Subpopulations after In Vitro Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation at 2500 MHz and Their Motility.

Zura Zaja I, Vince S, Butkovic I, Senasi K, Poljicak Milas N, Malaric K Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38539926 PMC: 10967574. DOI: 10.3390/ani14060828.


Effect of silymarin and metformin on the sperm parameters and histopathological changes of testes in diabetic rats: An experimental study.

Pourheydar B, Azarm F, Farjah G, Karimipour M, Pourheydar M Int J Reprod Biomed. 2022; 19(12):1091-1104.

PMID: 35098011 PMC: 8792380. DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v19i12.10060.


Does the Use of Mobile Phone Affect Male Fertility? A Mini-Review.

Okechukwu C J Hum Reprod Sci. 2020; 13(3):174-183.

PMID: 33311902 PMC: 7727890. DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_126_19.


Whole-body exposures to radiofrequency-electromagnetic energy can cause DNA damage in mouse spermatozoa via an oxidative mechanism.

Houston B, Nixon B, McEwan K, Martin J, King B, Aitken R Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):17478.

PMID: 31767903 PMC: 6877509. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-53983-9.


References
1.
Banik S, Bandyopadhyay S, Ganguly S . Bioeffects of microwave--a brief review. Bioresour Technol. 2003; 87(2):155-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8524(02)00169-4. View

2.
Benzie I, Strain J . The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of "antioxidant power": the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem. 1996; 239(1):70-6. DOI: 10.1006/abio.1996.0292. View

3.
Koyu A, Cesur G, Ozguner F, Akdogan M, Mollaoglu H, Ozen S . Effects of 900 MHz electromagnetic field on TSH and thyroid hormones in rats. Toxicol Lett. 2005; 157(3):257-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.03.006. View

4.
Oktem F, Ozguner F, Mollaoglu H, Koyu A, Uz E . Oxidative damage in the kidney induced by 900-MHz-emitted mobile phone: protection by melatonin. Arch Med Res. 2005; 36(4):350-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2005.03.021. View

5.
Verschaeve L, Maes A . Genetic, carcinogenic and teratogenic effects of radiofrequency fields. Mutat Res. 1998; 410(2):141-65. DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5742(97)00037-9. View