The Effect of Filled and Empty Intervals on Clock and Memory Processes in Pigeons

Overview

Journal Learn Behav

Publisher Springer

Specialties Psychology
Social Sciences
Veterinary Medicine

Date 2014 Feb 13

PMID 24519455

Authors

Elizabeth Price

Angelo Santi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

According to the mixed memory model (Penney, Gibbon, & Meck, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1770-1787, 2000), different clock rates for stimuli with different nontemporal properties must be stored within a single reference memory distribution in order to detect a difference between the clock rates of the different signals. In Experiment 1, pigeons were trained in a between-subjects design to discriminate empty intervals (bound by two 1-s visual markers) and filled intervals (a continuous visual signal). The intervals were signaled by different visual stimuli, and they required responses to different sets of comparison stimuli. Empty intervals were judged as being longer than filled intervals. The difference between the point of subjective equality (PSE) for the empty intervals and the PSE for the filled intervals increased proportionally as the magnitudes of the anchor duration pairs were increased from 2 and 8 s to 4 and 16 s. In Experiment 2, the pigeons were trained to discriminate intervals signaled by the absence of houselight illumination (Group Empty) or the presence of houselight illumination (Group Filled). The psychophysical timing functions for these intervals were identical to each other. The results of Experiment 1 indicate that memory mixing is not necessary for detecting a timing difference between empty and filled intervals in pigeons. The results of Experiment 2 suggest that the nature of the stimuli that signal the empty and filled intervals impacts how pigeons judge the durations of empty and filled intervals.

References

Wearden J, Todd N, Jones L . When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur?. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006; 59(10):1709-24. DOI: 10.1080/17470210500314729. View

Roberts W, Cheng K, Cohen J . Timing light and tone signals in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1989; 15(1):23-35. View

Kraemer P, Brown R, Randall C . Signal intensity and duration estimation in rats. Behav Processes. 2014; 34(3):265-8. DOI: 10.1016/0376-6357(95)00003-d. View

Wearden J, Ferrara A . Stimulus range effects in temporal bisection by humans. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1996; 49(1):24-44. DOI: 10.1080/713932615. View

Goldstone S, GOLDFARB J . JUDGMENT OF FILLED AND UNFILLED DURATIONS: INTERSENSORY FACTORS. Percept Mot Skills. 1963; 17:763-74. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1963.17.3.763. View

Stubbs D, Dreyfus L, Fetterman J . The perception of temporal events. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1984; 423:30-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23415.x. View

Lejeune H, Macar F, Zakay D . Attention and timing: dual-task performance in pigeons. Behav Processes. 2014; 45(1-3):141-57. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(99)00015-7. View

Goldstone S, LHAMON W . Studies of auditory-visual differences in human time judgment. 1. Sounds are judged longer than lights. Percept Mot Skills. 1974; 39(1):63-82. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1974.39.1.63. View

Buhusi C, Meck W . Time sharing in rats: A peak-interval procedure with gaps and distracters. Behav Processes. 2006; 71(2-3):107-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.11.017. View

10.

Meck W . Selective adjustment of the speed of internal clock and memory processes. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1983; 9(2):171-201. View

11.

Santi A, Miki A, Hornyak S, Eidse J . The perception of empty and filled time intervals by rats. Behav Processes. 2005; 70(3):247-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.07.006. View

12.

Santi A, Adams A, Bassett J . The role of keypecking during filled intervals on the judgment of time for empty and filled intervals by pigeons. Learn Behav. 2010; 38(1):42-9. DOI: 10.3758/LB.38.1.42. View

13.

Penney T, Gibbon J, Meck W . Categorical scaling of duration bisection in pigeons (Columba livia), mice (Mus musculus), and humans (Homo sapiens). Psychol Sci. 2008; 19(11):1103-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02210.x. View

14.

Miki A, Santi A . The perception of empty and filled time intervals by pigeons. Q J Exp Psychol B. 2005; 58(1):31-45. DOI: 10.1080/0272499044000032. View

15.

Molet M, Alessandri J, Zentall T . Subjective time: cognitive and physical secondary tasks affect timing differently. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011; 64(7):1344-53. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.552728. View

16.

Wearden J, Rogers P, Thomas R . Temporal bisection in humans with longer stimulus durations. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1997; 50(1):79-94. DOI: 10.1080/027249997393655. View

17.

Rammsayer T . Differences in duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals as a function of base duration. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010; 72(6):1591-600. DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.6.1591. View

18.

Abel S . Duration discrimination of noise and tone bursts. J Acoust Soc Am. 1972; 51(4):1219-23. DOI: 10.1121/1.1912963. View

19.

Buhusi C, Paskalis J, Cerutti D . Time-sharing in pigeons: Independent effects of gap duration, position and discriminability from the timed signal. Behav Processes. 2006; 71(2-3):116-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.10.006. View

20.

Block R, Zakay D . Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011; 4(2):184-97. DOI: 10.3758/BF03209393. View