» Articles » PMID: 24518862

Individual Differences in the Forced Swimming Test and Neurochemical Kinetics in the Rat Brain

Overview
Journal Physiol Behav
Date 2014 Feb 13
PMID 24518862
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Individual differences in the forced swimming test (FST) could be associated with differential temporal dynamics of gene expression and neurotransmitter activity. We tested juvenile male rats in the FST and classified the animals into those with low and high immobility according to the amount of immobility time recorded in FST. These groups and a control group which did not undergo the FST were sacrificed either 1, 6 or 24 h after the test. We analyzed the expression of the CRF, CRFR1, BDNF and TrkB in the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and nucleus accumbens as well as norepinephrine, dopamine, serotonin, glutamate, GABA and glutamine in the hippocampus and nucleus accumbens. Animals with low immobility showed significant reductions of BDNF expression across time points in both the prefrontal cortex and the nucleus accumbens when compared with non-swim control. Moreover, rats with high immobility only showed a significant decrease of BDNF expression in the prefrontal cortex 6h after the FST. Regarding neurotransmitters, only accumbal dopamine turnover and hippocampal glutamate content showed an effect of individual differences (i.e. animals with low and high immobility), whereas nearly all parameters showed significant differences across time points. Correlational analyses suggest that immobility in the FST, probably reflecting despair, is related to prefrontal cortical BDNF and to the kinetics observed in several other neurochemical parameters. Taken together, our results suggest that individual differences observed in depression-like behavior can be associated not only with changes in the concentrations of key neurochemical factors but also with differential time courses of such factors.

Citing Articles

Molecular Signaling Mechanisms for the Antidepressant Effects of NLX-101, a Selective Cortical 5-HT Receptor Biased Agonist.

Cabanu S, Pilar-Cuellar F, Zubakina P, Florensa-Zanuy E, Senserrich J, Newman-Tancredi A Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022; 15(3).

PMID: 35337135 PMC: 8954942. DOI: 10.3390/ph15030337.


Variability in Behavioral Phenotypes after Forced Swimming-Induced Stress in Rats Is Associated with Expression of the Glucocorticoid Receptor, Nurr1, and IL-1β in the Hippocampus.

Ruiz-Sanchez E, Lopez-Ramirez A, Ruiz-Chow A, Calvillo M, Resendiz-Albor A, Anguiano B Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(23).

PMID: 34884503 PMC: 8657438. DOI: 10.3390/ijms222312700.


Behavioural characterisation of chronic unpredictable stress based on ethologically relevant paradigms in rats.

Sequeira-Cordero A, Salas-Bastos A, Fornaguera J, Brenes J Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):17403.

PMID: 31758000 PMC: 6874551. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-53624-1.


Stress hormone exposure reduces mGluR5 expression in the nucleus accumbens: functional implications for interoceptive sensitivity to alcohol.

Besheer J, Fisher K, Jaramillo A, Frisbee S, Cannady R Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014; 39(10):2376-86.

PMID: 24713611 PMC: 4138747. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2014.85.

References
1.
Edholm O, Adam J, Healy M, Wolff H, Goldsmith R, Best T . Food intake and energy expenditure of army recruits. Br J Nutr. 1970; 24(4):1091-107. DOI: 10.1079/bjn19700112. View

2.
Friedman J . Modern science versus the stigma of obesity. Nat Med. 2004; 10(6):563-9. DOI: 10.1038/nm0604-563. View

3.
Payne P, Dugdale A . A model for the prediction of energy balance and body weight. Ann Hum Biol. 1977; 4(6):525-35. DOI: 10.1080/03014467700002521. View

4.
Kim W, Kelsay J, Judd J, Marshall M, Mertz W, PRATHER E . Evaluation of long-term dietary intakes of adults consuming self-selected diets. Am J Clin Nutr. 1984; 40(6 Suppl):1327-32. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/40.6.1327. View

5.
Roberts S, Young V, Fuss P, Fiatarone M, Richard B, Rasmussen H . Energy expenditure and subsequent nutrient intakes in overfed young men. Am J Physiol. 1990; 259(3 Pt 2):R461-9. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1990.259.3.R461. View