» Articles » PMID: 24511511

Long-term Pharyngeal Airway Changes After Bionator Treatment in Adolescents with Skeletal Class II Malocclusions

Overview
Journal Korean J Orthod
Date 2014 Feb 11
PMID 24511511
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term changes in the pharyngeal airway dimensions after functional appliance treatment in adolescents with skeletal Class II malocclusions.

Methods: Pharyngeal airway dimensions were compared between subjects with skeletal Class II malocclusions (n = 24; mean age: 11.6 ± 1.29 years) treated with a Class II bionator and age-matched control subjects with skeletal Class I occlusions (n = 24; mean age: 11.0 ± 1.21 years) using a series of lateral cephalograms obtained at the initial visit (T0), after treatment (T1), and at the completion of growth (T2).

Results: The length of the nasopharyngeal region was similar between adolescents with skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions at all time points, while the lengths of the upper and lower oropharyngeal regions and the pharyngeal airway areas were significantly smaller in the skeletal Class II adolescents before treatment when compared to the control adolescents (p < 0.05). However, following treatment with a functional appliance, the skeletal Class II adolescents had increased pharyngeal airway dimensions, which became similar to those of the control subjects.

Conclusions: Functional appliance therapy can increase the pharyngeal airway dimensions in growing adolescents with skeletal Class II malocclusions, and this effect is maintained until the completion of growth.

Citing Articles

Changes in the Upper Airway Dimension Following the Use of Functional Appliances in Children with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review.

Scribante A, Pascadopoli M, Zampetti P, Rocchi C, Falsarone F, Sfondrini M Children (Basel). 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40003329 PMC: 11854760. DOI: 10.3390/children12020227.


Correlation between different boundaries used in upper airway assessment.

Aksoz G, El H, Palomo J BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):19.

PMID: 39755673 PMC: 11699794. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05402-3.


Cephalometric evaluation of pharyngeal airway and tongue space following treatment with Herbst and AdvanSync appliances : A prospective randomized clinical trial.

Arora S, Grover S, Harikrishnan P, Dabas A, Dogra N, Nindra J J Orofac Orthop. 2023; 85(Suppl 1):7-18.

PMID: 36853337 DOI: 10.1007/s00056-023-00449-3.


Three-dimensional evaluation of upper airway changes following rapid maxillary expansion: A retrospective comparison with propensity score matched controls.

Aljawad H, Lee K, Lim H PLoS One. 2021; 16(12):e0261579.

PMID: 34941970 PMC: 8699684. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261579.


Comparison of oropharyngeal airway dimensional changes in patients with skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions after orthognathic surgery and functional appliance treatment: A systematic review.

Alqahtani F, George J, Bishawi K, Kuriadom S Saudi Dent J. 2021; 33(8):860-868.

PMID: 34938026 PMC: 8665181. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.09.013.


References
1.
Avrahami E, Englender M . Relation between CT axial cross-sectional area of the oropharynx and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in adults. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995; 16(1):135-40. PMC: 8337682. View

2.
Hanggi M, Teuscher U, Roos M, Peltomaki T . Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2008; 30(6):598-605. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjn055. View

3.
Restrepo C, Santamaria A, Pelaez S, Tapias A . Oropharyngeal airway dimensions after treatment with functional appliances in class II retrognathic children. J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38(8):588-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02199.x. View

4.
SUBTELNY J, Baker H . The significance of adenoid tissue in velopharyngeal function. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946). 1956; 17(3):235-50. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-195603000-00008. View

5.
McNamara Jr J . A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod. 1984; 86(6):449-69. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9416(84)90352-x. View