» Articles » PMID: 24511160

A Bayesian Dose-finding Design for Oncology Clinical Trials of Combinational Biological Agents

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2014 Feb 11
PMID 24511160
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Treating patients with novel biological agents is becoming a leading trend in oncology. Unlike cytotoxic agents, for which efficacy and toxicity monotonically increase with dose, biological agents may exhibit non-monotonic patterns in their dose-response relationships. Using a trial with two biological agents as an example, we propose a dose-finding design to identify the biologically optimal dose combination (BODC), which is defined as the dose combination of the two agents with the highest efficacy and tolerable toxicity. A change-point model is used to reflect the fact that the dose-toxicity surface of the combinational agents may plateau at higher dose levels, and a flexible logistic model is proposed to accommodate the possible non-monotonic pattern for the dose-efficacy relationship. During the trial, we continuously update the posterior estimates of toxicity and efficacy and assign patients to the most appropriate dose combination. We propose a novel dose-finding algorithm to encourage sufficient exploration of untried dose combinations in the two-dimensional space. Extensive simulation studies show that the proposed design has desirable operating characteristics in identifying the BODC under various patterns of dose-toxicity and dose-efficacy relationships.

Citing Articles

Assessment of Cell Viability in Drug Therapy: IC50 and Other New Time-Independent Indices for Evaluating Chemotherapy Efficacy.

Sanchez-Diez M, Romero-Jimenez P, Alegria-Aravena N, Gavira-ONeill C, Vicente-Garcia E, Quiroz-Troncoso J Pharmaceutics. 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 40006615 PMC: 11859577. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17020247.


Determining doses for backfill cohorts based on patient-reported outcome.

Chen X, Zhang J, Li B, Yan F BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024; 24(1):270.

PMID: 39516724 PMC: 11546322. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02398-w.


Adaptive phase I-II clinical trial designs identifying optimal biological doses for targeted agents and immunotherapies.

Zang Y, Guo B, Qiu Y, Liu H, Opyrchal M, Lu X Clin Trials. 2024; 21(3):298-307.

PMID: 38205644 PMC: 11132954. DOI: 10.1177/17407745231220661.


Local continual reassessment methods for dose finding and optimization in drug-combination trials.

Zhang J, Yan F, Wages N, Lin R Stat Methods Med Res. 2023; 32(10):2049-2063.

PMID: 37593951 PMC: 10563380. DOI: 10.1177/09622802231192955.


Accuracy and Safety of Novel Designs for Phase I Drug-Combination Oncology Trials.

Liu R, Yuan Y, Sen S, Yang X, Jiang Q, Li X Stat Biopharm Res. 2023; 14(3):270-282.

PMID: 37275462 PMC: 10237505. DOI: 10.1080/19466315.2022.2081602.


References
1.
Yuan Y, Yin G . Sequential continual reassessment method for two-dimensional dose finding. Stat Med. 2008; 27(27):5664-78. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3372. View

2.
Wang K, Ivanova A . Two-dimensional dose finding in discrete dose space. Biometrics. 2005; 61(1):217-22. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.030540.x. View

3.
Yuan Y, Yin G . Robust EM Continual Reassessment Method in Oncology Dose Finding. J Am Stat Assoc. 2012; 106(495):818-831. PMC: 3286608. DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2011.ap09476. View

4.
Braun T, Wang S . A hierarchical Bayesian design for phase I trials of novel combinations of cancer therapeutic agents. Biometrics. 2009; 66(3):805-12. PMC: 2889231. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01363.x. View

5.
Paoletti X, Kramar A . A comparison of model choices for the Continual Reassessment Method in phase I cancer trials. Stat Med. 2009; 28(24):3012-28. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3682. View