» Articles » PMID: 24510352

The Influence of Vertically and Horizontally Aligned Visual Distractors on Aurally Guided Saccadic Eye Movements

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2014 Feb 11
PMID 24510352
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Eye movements towards a new target can be guided or disrupted by input from multiple modalities. The degree of oculomotor competition evoked by a distractor depends on both distractor and target properties, such as distractor salience or certainty regarding the target location. The ability to localize the target is particularly important when studying saccades made towards auditory targets, since determination of elevation and azimuth of a sound are based on different processes, and these processes may be affected independently by a distractor. We investigated the effects of a visual distractor on saccadic eye movements made to an auditory target in a two-dimensional plane. Results showed that the competition evoked by a vertical visual distractor was stronger compared with a horizontal visual distractor. The eye movements that were not captured by the vertical visual distractor were still influenced by it: a deviation of endpoints was seen in the direction of the visual distractor. Furthermore, the interference evoked by a high-contrast visual distractor was stronger compared with low-contrast visual stimuli, which was reflected by a faster initiation of an eye movement towards the high-contrast visual distractor and a stronger shift of endpoints in the direction of the high-contrast visual distractor. Together, these findings show that the influence of a visual distractor on aurally guided eye movements depends strongly on its location relative to the target, and to a lesser extent, on stimulus contrast.

Citing Articles

Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors.

Heeman J, Nijboer T, Van der Stoep N, Theeuwes J, Van der Stigchel S Vision Res. 2016; 123:46-55.

PMID: 27164053 PMC: 4894297. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.04.002.


Prior knowledge of spatiotemporal configuration facilitates crossmodal saccadic response : A TWIN analysis.

Diederich A, Colonius H, Kandil F Exp Brain Res. 2016; 234(7):2059-2076.

PMID: 26975319 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4609-5.


Lack of multisensory integration in hemianopia: no influence of visual stimuli on aurally guided saccades to the blind hemifield.

Ten Brink A, Nijboer T, Bergsma D, Barton J, Van der Stigchel S PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0122054.

PMID: 25835952 PMC: 4383622. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122054.

References
1.
Hunt A, Olk B, von Muhlenen A, Kingstone A . Integration of competing saccade programs. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004; 19(2):206-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.12.004. View

2.
Van der Stigchel S, Theeuwes J . Differences in distractor-induced deviation between horizontal and vertical saccade trajectories. Neuroreport. 2008; 19(2):251-4. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f49b3f. View

3.
Corneil B, Van Wanrooij M, Munoz D, Van Opstal A . Auditory-visual interactions subserving goal-directed saccades in a complex scene. J Neurophysiol. 2002; 88(1):438-54. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.1.438. View

4.
Stevenson R, Krueger Fister J, Barnett Z, Nidiffer A, Wallace M . Interactions between the spatial and temporal stimulus factors that influence multisensory integration in human performance. Exp Brain Res. 2012; 219(1):121-37. PMC: 3526341. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3072-1. View

5.
Hairston W, Wallace M, Vaughan J, Stein B, Norris J, Schirillo J . Visual localization ability influences cross-modal bias. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003; 15(1):20-9. DOI: 10.1162/089892903321107792. View