» Articles » PMID: 24509903

Apoptosis Imaging for Monitoring DR5 Antibody Accumulation and Pharmacodynamics in Brain Tumors Noninvasively

Overview
Journal Cancer Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2014 Feb 11
PMID 24509903
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

High-grade gliomas often possess an impaired blood-brain barrier (BBB), which allows delivery of large molecules to brain tumors. However, achieving optimal drug concentrations in brain tumors remains a significant hurdle for treating patients successfully. Thus, detailed investigations of drug activities in gliomas are needed. To investigate BBB penetration, pharmacodynamics, and tumor retention kinetics of an agonistic DR5 antibody in a brain tumor xenograft model, we utilized a noninvasive imaging method for longitudinal monitoring of apoptosis induction. Brain tumors were induced by intracranial (i.c.) implantation of a luciferase-expressing tumor cell line as a reporter. To quantify accumulation of anti-DR5 in brain tumors, we generated a dosage-response curve for apoptosis induction after i.c. delivery of fluorescence-labeled anti-DR5 at different dosages. Assuming 100% drug delivery after i.c. application, the amount of accumulated antibody after i.v. application was calculated relative to its apoptosis induction. We found that up to 0.20% to 0.97% of antibody delivered i.v. reached the brain tumor, but that apoptosis induction declined quickly within 24 hours. These results were confirmed by three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy of antibody accumulation in explanted brains. Nonetheless, significant antitumor efficacy was documented after anti-DR5 delivery. We further demonstrated that antibody penetration was facilitated by an impaired BBB in brain tumors. These imaging methods enable the quantification of antibody accumulation and pharmacodynamics in brain tumors, offering a holistic approach for assessment of central nervous system-targeting drugs.

Citing Articles

Targeting Death Receptor 5 (DR5) for the imaging and treatment of primary bone and soft tissue tumors: an update of the literature.

Gamie Z, Krippner-Heidenreich A, Gerrand C, Rankin K Front Mol Biosci. 2024; 11:1384795.

PMID: 39286782 PMC: 11402684. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1384795.


microRNAs targeting cellular cholesterol: implications for combating anticancer drug resistance.

Monchusi B, Kaur M Genes Cancer. 2020; 11(1-2):20-42.

PMID: 32577155 PMC: 7289906. DOI: 10.18632/genesandcancer.202.


Mistiming Death: Modeling the Time-Domain Variability of Tumor Apoptosis and Implications for Molecular Imaging of Cell Death.

Gammon S, Engel B, Gores G, Cressman E, Piwnica-Worms D, Millward S Mol Imaging Biol. 2020; 22(5):1310-1323.

PMID: 32519246 PMC: 8279023. DOI: 10.1007/s11307-020-01509-5.


Involvement of Intracellular Cholesterol in Temozolomide-Induced Glioblastoma Cell Death.

Yamamoto Y, Sasaki N, Kumagai K, Takeuchi S, Toyooka T, Otani N Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2018; 58(7):296-302.

PMID: 29899179 PMC: 6048351. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.ra.2018-0040.


Noninvasive Bioluminescence Imaging of AKT Kinase Activity in Subcutaneous and Orthotopic NSCLC Xenografts: Correlation of AKT Activity with Tumor Growth Kinetics.

Suchowski K, Poschinger T, Rehemtulla A, Sturzl M, Scheuer W Neoplasia. 2017; 19(4):310-320.

PMID: 28285180 PMC: 5379573. DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2017.02.005.


References
1.
Saito R, Bringas J, Panner A, Tamas M, Pieper R, Berger M . Convection-enhanced delivery of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand with systemic administration of temozolomide prolongs survival in an intracranial glioblastoma xenograft model. Cancer Res. 2004; 64(19):6858-62. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1683. View

2.
Siegal T . Which drug or drug delivery system can change clinical practice for brain tumor therapy?. Neuro Oncol. 2013; 15(6):656-69. PMC: 3661099. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/not016. View

3.
Iqbal U, Trojahn U, Albaghdadi H, Zhang J, OConnor-McCourt M, Stanimirovic D . Kinetic analysis of novel mono- and multivalent VHH-fragments and their application for molecular imaging of brain tumours. Br J Pharmacol. 2010; 160(4):1016-28. PMC: 2936006. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00742.x. View

4.
Aprile I, Muti M, Principi M, Bartolini N, Zenoni A, Tazza G . A Magnetic Resonance comparative study between enhancement, rCBV and ACD in brain glioblastomas. Radiol Med. 2002; 104(1-2):87-91. View

5.
Dobosz M, Ntziachristos V, Scheuer W, Strobel S . Multispectral fluorescence ultramicroscopy: three-dimensional visualization and automatic quantification of tumor morphology, drug penetration, and antiangiogenic treatment response. Neoplasia. 2014; 16(1):1-13. PMC: 3924547. DOI: 10.1593/neo.131848. View