» Articles » PMID: 24506826

Systematic Review of Surgical Treatment Techniques for Adult and Pediatric Patients with Pectus Excavatum

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This compares outcome measures of current pectus excavatum (PEx) treatments, namely the Nuss and Ravitch procedures, in pediatric and adult patients. Original investigations that stratified PEx patients based on current treatment and age (pediatric=0-21; adult 17-99) were considered for inclusion. Outcome measures were: operation duration, analgesia duration, blood loss, length of stay (LOS), outcome ratings, complications, and percentage requiring reoperations. Adult implant patients (18.8%) had higher reoperation rates than adult Nuss or Ravitch patients (5.3% and 3.3% respectively). Adult Nuss patients had longer LOS (7.3 days), more strut/bar displacement (6.1%), and more epidural analgesia (3 days) than adult Ravitch patients (2.9 days, 0%, 0 days). Excluding pectus bar and strut displacements, pediatric and adult Nuss patients tended to have higher complication rates (pediatric - 38%; adult - 21%) compared to pediatric and adult Ravitch patients (12.5%; 8%). Pediatric Ravitch patients clearly had more strut displacements than adult Ravitch patients (0% and 6.4% respectively). These results suggest significantly better results in common PEx surgical repair techniques (i.e. Nuss and Ravitch) than uncommon techniques (i.e. Implants and Robicsek). The results suggest slightly better outcomes in pediatric Nuss procedure patients as compared with all other groups. We recommend that symptomatic pediatric patients with uncomplicated PEx receive the Nuss procedure. We suggest that adult patients receive the Nuss or Ravitch procedure, even though the long-term complication rates of the adult Nuss procedure require more investigation.

Citing Articles

Intraoperative Hemodynamic Instability in Concomitant Pectus Excavatum and Scoliosis.

Keefe G, Beauchamp E, Lilly J, Duron V, Anderson R, Vitale M Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2025; 1(3):454-457.

PMID: 39790962 PMC: 11708660. DOI: 10.1016/j.atssr.2023.05.005.


Quality of life with minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mohamed J, Tan J, Tam J Ann Transl Med. 2024; 11(12):407.

PMID: 38213813 PMC: 10777225. DOI: 10.21037/atm-23-1647.


Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum in adults: a review article of presentation, workup, and surgical treatment.

Aly M, Farina J, Botros M, Jaroszewski D J Thorac Dis. 2023; 15(9):5150-5173.

PMID: 37868874 PMC: 10587002. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-87.


Systematic review of physiological and psychological outcomes of surgery for pectus excavatum supporting commissioning of service in the UK.

Walsh J, Walsh R, Redmond K BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023; 10(1).

PMID: 37827806 PMC: 10582895. DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001665.


The new steel bar in pectus carinatum repair and a review of current methods of correcting chest deformations.

Skrzypczak P, Kasprzyk M, Piwkowski C J Thorac Dis. 2022; 14(10):3671-3673.

PMID: 36389318 PMC: 9641324. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-22-956.


References
1.
Hu T, Li Y, Liu W, Wu X, Feng J . Surgical treatment of pectus excavatum: 30 years 398 patients of experiences. J Pediatr Surg. 2008; 43(7):1270-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.02.075. View

2.
Saxena A, Willital G . Valuable lessons from two decades of pectus repair with the Willital-Hegemann procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007; 134(4):871-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.06.008. View

3.
Grappolini S, Fanzio P, DAddetta P, Todde A, Infante M . Aesthetic treatment of pectus excavatum: a new endoscopic technique using a porous polyethylene implant. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007; 32(1):105-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-007-9025-6. View

4.
Jo W, Choi Y, Sohn Y, Kim H, Hwang J, Cho S . Surgical treatment for pectus excavatum. J Korean Med Sci. 2003; 18(3):360-4. PMC: 3055048. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2003.18.3.360. View

5.
Robicsek F, Watts L, Fokin A . Surgical repair of pectus excavatum and carinatum. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 21(1):64-75. DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2009.03.002. View