» Articles » PMID: 24503589

The Current Situation and Needs of Rare Disease Registries in Europe

Overview
Specialties Genetics
Public Health
Date 2014 Feb 8
PMID 24503589
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Registries are considered key instruments for developing rare disease (RD) clinical research, enhancing patient care and health planning, and improving social, economic and quality-of-life outcomes. Indeed, it is usually the case that no single institution, and in many cases no single country, has sufficient data to provide results that can be applied broadly to clinical and translational research. However, the fragmentation and heterogeneity of the registries, which are often the result of spontaneous initiatives, limit the general applicability of their observations.

Methods: An inquiry has been carried out by the EPIRARE, a European Union (EU)-funded project ('Building Consensus and Synergies for the EU Registration of Rare Disease Patients') aiming at paving the way to the creation of a European Platform for RD Registries, by means of an on-line questionnaire among European RD registries on their main activities and needs, the way they deal with methodological, technical and regulatory issues and the way they find resources to carry on their activities.

Results: In spite of the heterogeneity of the European registries, some elements of relevance for an action to improve the situation of patient registries in the EU are apparent. The needs more frequently indicated by registry holders were financial support, motivation of data providers, data quality assessment, improvement of communication and visibility, and extension of collaborations. Moreover, the registry holders were in favor of a common EU platform providing services for RD registries.

Conclusion: It appears that the current situation of the European registries provides the transition towards a more uniform, higher quality and better coordinated approach.

Citing Articles

Informing a national rare disease registry strategy in Australia: a mixed methods study.

Ruseckaite R, Caruso M, Mudunna C, Helwani F, Millis N, Ahern S BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):1187.

PMID: 37907945 PMC: 10619239. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10049-x.


Challenges in mapping European rare disease databases, relevant for ML-based screening technologies in terms of organizational, FAIR and legal principles: scoping review.

Raycheva R, Kostadinov K, Mitova E, Bogoeva N, Iskrov G, Stefanov G Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1214766.

PMID: 37780450 PMC: 10540868. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1214766.


Congenital disorders of glycosylation: narration of a story through its patents.

Monticelli M, DOnofrio T, Jaeken J, Morava E, Andreotti G, Cubellis M Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023; 18(1):247.

PMID: 37644541 PMC: 10466741. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-023-02852-w.


A systematic overview of rare disease patient registries: challenges in design, quality management, and maintenance.

Hageman I, van Rooij I, de Blaauw I, Trajanovska M, King S Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023; 18(1):106.

PMID: 37147718 PMC: 10163740. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-023-02719-0.


High resolution data modifies intensive care unit dialysis outcome predictions as compared with low resolution administrative data set.

Ziegler J, Rush B, Gottlieb E, Celi L, Armengol de la Hoz M PLOS Digit Health. 2023; 1(10):e0000124.

PMID: 36812632 PMC: 9931257. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000124.