» Articles » PMID: 2450263

Similarities in the Mechanism of Action of Two New Vasodilator Drugs: Pinacidil and BRL 34915

Overview
Date 1988 Jan 1
PMID 2450263
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study compares the in vitro and in vivo activities of pinacidil with another new vasodilator drug, BRL 34915, claimed to act via the opening of K+ channels in vascular smooth muscle. In the rabbit aorta, BRL 34915 and pinacidil caused rightward shifts of the KCl concentration-response curve and noncompetitively antagonized angiotensin II contractions, yielding an IC50 of 5 and 10 microM, respectively. In 86Rb-loaded guinea pig portal veins, both BRL 34915 and pinacidil stimulated 86Rb+ efflux over the concentration range 0.3-30 microM. At saturating concentrations, the maximum efflux elicited by pinacidil was only one-third that of BRL 34915. Spontaneous activity measured simultaneously from the same vessels was inhibited by BRL 34915 and pinacidil with an IC50 of 12 and 32 nM, respectively. Effects on mechanical activity were thus observed at drug concentrations 100-fold lower than those required to stimulate 86Rb+ efflux. In anesthetized rats, both compounds rapidly lowered blood pressure, with BRL 34915 being threefold more potent than pinacidil in this respect. Tachycardia was more pronounced after BRL 34915 than after pinacidil. Angiotensin II pressor responses were poorly antagonized by these two vasodilators in rats, in marked contrast to the potent effects of Ca2+ antagonists on these responses at equieffective hypotensive doses. We conclude the pinacidil, like BRL 34915, is a potent antihypertensive that is able to enhance the K+ permeability of vascular smooth muscle. The similarities between these two drugs suggest they have a common mechanism of action. However, the discrepancy between the concentrations of these drugs necessary to stimulate 86Rb efflux, and those at which mechanical effects are seen in the portal vein, do not rule out the possibility that other actions may contribute to their vasodilator activities.

Citing Articles

Effects of pinacidil on arterial and venous resistances and mean circulatory filling pressure in rats.

Waite R, Lim S, Pang C Br J Pharmacol. 1995; 116(4):2322-6.

PMID: 8564267 PMC: 1908986. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb15072.x.


A comparison of the inhibitory effects of sodium nitroprusside, pinacidil and nifedipine on pressor response to NG-nitro-L-arginine.

Wang Y, Zhou T, Pang C Br J Pharmacol. 1993; 108(2):398-404.

PMID: 8448590 PMC: 1907969. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1993.tb12816.x.


Effects of pinacidil on cerebral and mesenteric arteries--influence of the endothelium.

Ryman T, Petersson J, Andersson K, Brandt L, Hogestatt E Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1993; 348(3):298-304.

PMID: 7901778 DOI: 10.1007/BF00169159.


Vasodilatation with pinacidil. Mode of action in rat resistance vessels.

Videbaek L, Aalkjaer C, Mulvany M Drugs. 1988; 36 Suppl 7:33-40.

PMID: 3254830 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198800367-00006.


Pinacidil opens K+-selective channels causing hyperpolarization and relaxation of noradrenaline contractions in rat mesenteric resistance vessels.

Videbaek L, Aalkjaer C, Mulvany M Br J Pharmacol. 1988; 95(1):103-8.

PMID: 3219470 PMC: 1854119. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1988.tb16553.x.